From a7cc6d8eba31b2b0a1150d70740a9c883e80205f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerardo GANIS Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 08:54:38 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Other fixes (#133) --- fast-sim-and-analysis/FccFastSimGeneration.md | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fast-sim-and-analysis/FccFastSimGeneration.md b/fast-sim-and-analysis/FccFastSimGeneration.md index b001c711..47b2f9ba 100644 --- a/fast-sim-and-analysis/FccFastSimGeneration.md +++ b/fast-sim-and-analysis/FccFastSimGeneration.md @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ Running will take a few minutes. Among the last lines of the output there should | | *------- End PYTHIA Event and Cross Section Statistics ----------------------------------------------------------* ``` -i.e. 1467.0 +- 7.8 (1458.0 +- 7.7) pb. +i.e. 1458.0 +- 7.7 pb. ### Generating ditaus with Whizard @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ The taus are not decayed. We need another solution for that. ::: -The first lines of the `LHEf` file give the total cross-section: 1502 +- 2 pb 1.508 +- 2 pb, which seems definitely higher than the others. +The first lines of the `LHEf` file give the total cross-section: 1.508 +- 2 pb, which seems definitely higher than the others. #### `LHEf` to `EDM4hep` conversion @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ $ tail -37 kk/KKMCee-24Apr2023-060444/pro.output ******************************************************************************** ``` -i.e the total ditau cross-section at 91.2 GeV from `KKMCee` is 1485.2 +- 7.0 pb . +i.e the total ditau cross-section at 91.2 GeV from `KKMCee` is 1485.5 +- 0.007 pb . #### `HepMC` to `EDM4hep` conversion @@ -975,5 +975,5 @@ Think of your own. Expand for a possible one. :::{admonition} Hint :class: toggle -The distributions show a lot of similarities, which means that for detector optimisation studies the choice of the generator probably won't matter. However, the total cross-section is significantly different, so for studies where exact calculations matter more, the `KKMCee`, which is expected to be the most accurate of the three, seems the choice to go. +The distributions show a lot of similarities, which means that for detector optimisation studies the choice of the generator probably won't matter. However, the total cross-section is significantly different, so for studies where exact calculations matter more, the `KKMCee` seems the choice to go, because it is the only one giving the total cross-section compatible with experiment (ALEPH at 91.197 GeV gave 1.4771 ± 0.0066± 0.0027 pb). :::