You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi 3DGeo team,
I just tried the current dev version of HELIOS++ (GitHash: 4d50c54)
and figured out that intensity values return are abnormal (ranging from 0.0001 to 0.0007) compared to expected ones (around 500, depending of the setup)
Here are the graphs of the values distributions from the same simulation :
Using current dev version of HELIOS++ (v2) (GitHash: 4d50c54)
Using current stable version of HELIOS++ v1.3.0 (GitHash: 79df55e)
Also in the current dev version (v2), the argument --version still returns HELIOS_1.3.0_REL_pybind_dynBoost, you might want to change it to avoid confusions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear @NanBlanc, thank you very much for your observation. We are currently working on alternative energy models, which is why you get different results. If you want to use the dev branch with the old energy model, run with the --legacyEnergyModel flag to enable it.
Hi 3DGeo team,
I just tried the current dev version of HELIOS++ (GitHash: 4d50c54)
and figured out that intensity values return are abnormal (ranging from 0.0001 to 0.0007) compared to expected ones (around 500, depending of the setup)
Here are the graphs of the values distributions from the same simulation :
Using current dev version of HELIOS++ (v2) (GitHash: 4d50c54)
Using current stable version of HELIOS++ v1.3.0 (GitHash: 79df55e)
Also in the current dev version (v2), the argument --version still returns
HELIOS_1.3.0_REL_pybind_dynBoost
, you might want to change it to avoid confusionsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: