Skip to content

Functional Description of Channel Types #2489

Answered by t-bast
ShahanaFarooqui asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I'm not sure it's a good idea. We currently support various channel types, but it's only for backwards-compatibility purposes, anchor_outputs_zero_fee_htlc_tx is superior to all the other alternatives for node operators, so we should strongly nudge people towards using that one. I don't think a UI should even offer the choice to explicitly downgrade...

Replies: 2 comments 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by ShahanaFarooqui
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@t-bast
Comment options

@ShahanaFarooqui
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants