RootShape's role vs KL's role in water supply #9454
Unanswered
BrianCollinss
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
@hut104 @HamishBrownPFR I'd appreciate your comment. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Given that:
KL incorporates both plant and soil factors which limit rate of water uptake, and
RootShapeCylinder
assumes uniform root distribution across rooting depth,Is it correct to say: in a uniform soil profile (i.e., all soil layers are similar),
KL
must be the same across layers ifRootShape
model is NOTRootShapeCylinder
? In other words, whenRootShapeCylinder
is NOT used in a uniform soil profile, can we safely assume that all variations in KL are accounted for byRootShape
?Is it correct to say: all current values of KL, for example in APSoil, assume the plant model uses
RootShapeCylinder
(i.e., the impact of root distribution would be double-accounted if any otherRootShape
model is used)?Unrelated note: In
RootShapeSemiCircleSorghum
, there is a note: "The formula used for the circle is wrong as it does not account for the coordinate of the centre!"Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions