-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEAT] Improve dipole field specification #43
Comments
In general, we should implement different magnetic field models. For example: http://superdarn.thayer.dartmouth.edu/aacgm.html |
I would recommend using apex coordinates of AACGM-V2 coordinates, as they are undefined near the SAA. |
Do you know if we can get apex coordinates in C? (GITM uses APEX, so I am very used to APEX...) I am hoping to keep as much in C / C++ as possible. If we have to use fortran, we can figure out how to compile it in, but it would be nice to isolate is as much as possible. |
As far as I know it’s only in Fortran, but Leslie Lamarche just recently made it modern fortran! Could be possible to wrap or re-write, depending on the needs/resources of the project.
From: Aaron Ridley ***@***.***>
Reply-To: AetherModel/Aether ***@***.***>
Date: Friday, April 14, 2023 at 08:09
To: AetherModel/Aether ***@***.***>
Cc: "Burrell, Angeline G CIV USN NRL (7633) Washington DC (USA)" ***@***.***>, Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [AetherModel/Aether] [FEAT] Improve dipole field specification (#43)
Do you know if we can get apex coordinates in C? (GITM uses APEX, so I am very used to APEX...) I am hoping to keep as much in C / C++ as possible. If we have to use fortran, we can figure out how to compile it in, but it would be nice to isolate is as much as possible.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#43 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVYF7XVCVXCYGR7P2BNMPDXBE47ZANCNFSM4ZLC2WJQ>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In src/bfield.cpp, the following lines state:
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like this error to be fixed at some point.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Leaving only a simple dipole field
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: