You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a fairly unique issue. This might be more a future update request.
Project summary
I want to combine ws2812 and sk6812 led strips on one esp32 with multiple channel branch.
Problems I have faced:
Multi channel branch uses segments to separate channels. In settings i have to select between RGB & RGBW which is attached to all LEDs.
Solution
Not sure what's your idea on official multiple channel solution, but if segments will be used to separate channels, maybe tick box for RGB or RGBW for each segment/channel?
Suggestion
For multiple channel official version maybe have channel pins hardcoded and on app create channels similar to segments?
For ex.
Channel 0 - GPIO2
Channel 1 - GPIO12... etc.
And control them same way as segments?
For each channel ability to select 3 or 4 color mode separately.
I do understand that you can't please everyone.
I guess at the moment there is no easy way around this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello Aircoookie,
I have a fairly unique issue. This might be more a future update request.
Project summary
I want to combine ws2812 and sk6812 led strips on one esp32 with multiple channel branch.
Problems I have faced:
Multi channel branch uses segments to separate channels. In settings i have to select between RGB & RGBW which is attached to all LEDs.
Solution
Not sure what's your idea on official multiple channel solution, but if segments will be used to separate channels, maybe tick box for RGB or RGBW for each segment/channel?
Suggestion
For multiple channel official version maybe have channel pins hardcoded and on app create channels similar to segments?
For ex.
Channel 0 - GPIO2
Channel 1 - GPIO12... etc.
And control them same way as segments?
For each channel ability to select 3 or 4 color mode separately.
I do understand that you can't please everyone.
I guess at the moment there is no easy way around this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: