Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Analysis Section Idea: Patterns and Pitfalls #374

Open
jashapiro opened this issue Nov 23, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

New Analysis Section Idea: Patterns and Pitfalls #374

jashapiro opened this issue Nov 23, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
discussion Ideas and discussions that might lead to more specific actionable issues exploration

Comments

@jashapiro
Copy link
Member

jashapiro commented Nov 23, 2020

What are the goals of this new example analysis?

As we identify common patterns that people encounter in refine.bio, we should think about ways we can address these in examples. Here I am thinking of things that are not a particular analysis, but that would be common to multiple potential analyses. In a way, I am thinking about some of the things that are in the refine.bio FAQ, but might not be well addressed in that context. Think of it as the online supplemental materials for the FAQ.

I am calling it Patterns and Pitfalls, because I started thinking about it as common pitfalls, but that was too negative, and alliteration always amazes.

Some examples of things I am thinking about (I am sure there are more!):

  • Replicates in a data set (this was the original inspiration)

    • Identifying technical replicates (may include querying SRA?)
    • collapsing for RNAseq (for technical replicates)
    • specifying more complex models for DE?
  • Identifying and dropping outlier samples

    • Look at a PCA plot, perhaps?
  • I might move identifier mapping to this section?

  • Other common challenges that Deepa might have identified?

This is not a "before live" problem.

@jashapiro jashapiro added the discussion Ideas and discussions that might lead to more specific actionable issues label Nov 23, 2020
@jaclyn-taroni
Copy link
Member

To clarify, when you say FAQ do you mean #375 or https://github.com/AlexsLemonade/refinebio-docs/blob/master/docs/faq.md? I assume the latter, which is more about potential pitfalls than what's in #375.

@jashapiro
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah, I was thinking about the refine.bio FAQ, not the potential examples FAQ that I filed after this one....

@jaclyn-taroni
Copy link
Member

This may be better conceptualized as something that is standalone rather than part of our existing structure (intro, microarray, RNA-seq, advanced) that we "funnel" users to. (A bit of thought required about how to do that of course.) I'm think something like a Bioconductor vignette might be the right format. Here are a few examples to help illustrate what I mean:

Another way of putting it might be "one long file" with a TOC that covers all the patterns and pitfalls that is largely unconnected to what else we have (e.g., doesn't share a navbar).

@cansavvy
Copy link
Contributor

cansavvy commented Dec 9, 2020

Another issue that might be best served in this kind of format/vignette type deal is the metadata cleaning tips: #210

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Ideas and discussions that might lead to more specific actionable issues exploration
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants