Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support more forms of toplevel DRS disjunction in DRS->OWL #14

Open
Kaljurand opened this issue Jun 3, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Support more forms of toplevel DRS disjunction in DRS->OWL #14

Kaljurand opened this issue Jun 3, 2013 · 0 comments
Labels
drs_to_owlswrl

Comments

@Kaljurand
Copy link
Member

If each argument of the disjunction maps to OWL SubClassOf-axiom then they can be merged into a single SubClassOf-axiom and thus represented in OWL. See more in
http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/22864/expressing-axiom-disjunction-in-owl
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
drs_to_owlswrl
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Kaljurand