Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Palo-Alto Block IP Playbook connection issue with Palo Alto PAN-OS #8896

Closed
Shubham-Lale-Work opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 10 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
Playbook Playbook specialty review needed

Comments

@Shubham-Lale-Work
Copy link

Dear Members,

We are trying to configure this automation "Palo Alto-PAN-OS-Block IP" playbooks for on premise firewall. But we are unable to make connection to firewall as it sits in on premise network. Also, we have a doubt how the connection will be established. Need assistance on it!!
Note - Firewall public Ip is not exposed, also network admin access the console with their private ip

Error:

"message": "A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond."

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for submitting an Issue to the Azure Sentinel GitHub repo! You should expect an initial response to your Issue from the team within 5 business days. Note that this response may be delayed during holiday periods. For urgent, production-affecting issues please raise a support ticket via the Azure Portal.

@v-rbajaj v-rbajaj added the Playbook Playbook specialty review needed label Aug 29, 2023
@v-sudkharat
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Shubham-Lale-Work, thanks for flagging this issue, we will soon get back to you on this. Thanks!

@Shubham-Lale-Work
Copy link
Author

hello @v-rbajaj or @v-sudkharat any update on this? Or there is limitation with the current playbook workflow.

I received below error after re-configuring custom connector and playbook.
{
"statusCode": 500,
"headers": {
"Date": "",
"Content-Length": "",
"Content-Type": ""
},
"body": {
"error": {
"code": "InternalServerError",
"message": "An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions 10.10.10.100:443"
}
}
}

@v-rbajaj
Copy link
Contributor

v-rbajaj commented Sep 5, 2023

Hi @Shubham-Lale-Work,
Our current Palo Alto solution works with Cloud Palo Alto Firewall
If you want to use it with on prem, you would need to wait, as on prem version of playbooks is currently under development.

For using the current playbook you would need to make you would need to somehow expose the public IP, or you can use the firewall with public IP having rule that only some IP can access it.
Logic app will ask for URL of palo alto Firewall, which should not be https://ipaddress/, it should be it should be https://domainname/. (IP address should be mapped to any domain)

@Shubham-Lale-Work
Copy link
Author

Hey @v-rbajaj
thanks for your response.

Are there any work-around with the current solution available until the version is in development? using any other services for the connectivity .

@v-rbajaj
Copy link
Contributor

v-rbajaj commented Sep 5, 2023

Hi @Shubham-Lale-Work,
You can have the NATed IP to there public IP of firewall and assign one domain to NATed IP
make sure connection is https://

or second method, you can expose the public IP of Palo Alto PAN-VM and can have the rule that only particular IP can access the console.

Hope this helps.

@Shubham-Lale-Work
Copy link
Author

Hello @v-rbajaj ,
Aren't there any work around using azure automation or ISE feature we could explore if you have any blogs or another method present in this repository.
To highlight over here we are using consumption-based logic app.

@v-rbajaj
Copy link
Contributor

v-rbajaj commented Sep 7, 2023

Hi @Shubham-Lale-Work,
Currently our team is working on creating the on prem playbooks and connector for palo alto, so we are not thinking about any workaround , because within few months, we will be having working playbooks and connector in place.

As we are already working on this enhancement and tracking it internally, we are closing this issue for now.

In case you have further question, feel free re open the issue.

@v-rbajaj v-rbajaj closed this as completed Sep 7, 2023
@MReprogle1
Copy link

@v-rbajaj I am in the process of setting up Sentinel and came across your comment here. Is there an ETA for this on prem playbook by chance?

@deepakray184
Copy link

Any Update on On-Prem Firewall Playbooks?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Playbook Playbook specialty review needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants