-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: add psrule validation in both github and ADO #7323
Conversation
Hi @rushriva, please provide your feedback.Thanks |
Hi @rushriva, can you please provide your feedback on this. Thanks |
Hi @rushriva, please provide your feedback.Thanks |
Hi @rushriva, can you please provide your feedback on this. Thanks |
Hi @rushriva, could you please provide your feedback on this. Thanks |
Hi @rushriva, can you please provide your feedback on this. Thanks |
current master merged |
Hi @vakohl, please provide your feedback on this request. Thanks |
Hi @vakohl, could you please provide your feedback on this request. Thanks |
Hi @vakohl, please provide your feedback on this request. Thanks |
Hi @vakohl, |
Hi @vakohl, |
Hi @vakohl, |
Hi @vakohl, |
Hi @vakohl, |
Hi @daxesht, could you please provide your feedback on this. Thanks |
Hi @daxesht, please provide your feedback on this. Thanks |
Hi @daxesht, could you please provide your feedback on this. Thanks |
Hi @daxesht, please provide your feedback on this. Thanks |
Any update on this or path forward? |
Hi @juju4, I apologize for the inconvenience. We will provide you with an update by the 13th. Please update your branch from master in the meantime. Thanks |
Hi @juju4, Having analyzed the contents, we are not able to determine the reason for this change. Could you please elaborate on this and provide screenshots of this functionality if possible? Also the changes you are requesting are for both Github workflows and Azure pipelines, can't we handle this in one place instead of both? It would also be great if we could connect over a call to discuss further. Thanks |
Hi @juju4, waiting for your response over above comments and also please resolve branch conflicts. Thanks |
Hi @juju4, please check comments above and act accordingly. Thanks |
Hi @juju4, I am looking forward to your response to the above comments, as well as the resolution of branch conflicts. Thanks |
Hi @juju4, please respond over above comments and also please resolve branch conflicts. Thanks |
Hi @juju4, please check comments above and act accordingly. Thanks |
Hi @juju4, hope you are doing well. Just wanted to check if you got a chance to look at the feedback shared. Please feel free to reach out to us for any queries and/or support. Thanks |
The content of the PR has been explained in #7323 (comment) aka "Lint validation of ARM templates with https://github.com/Azure/PSRule.Rules.Azure/". It adds no functionality outside of validating more content but goes further than existing validations. similar to #7056 |
Noted @juju4, |
Hi @mkchiliveri , Can you please have a look? Seems related to our build pipeline |
Hi @juju4, |
Hi @juju4, As discussed, can you please check on if we can enforce this rule only on files committed as part of PR so that author can take an action immediately instead of the full review. |
Per Azure/ResourceModules#2150, not possible directly either.
Within github actions, maybe like microsoft/PSRule#688 with dependency on tj-actions/changed-files |
Hi @juju4, as discussed we will take this as internal feature and try to develop this in future. Thanks |
Change(s):
Reason for Change(s):
Version Updated:
Testing Completed:
Checked that the validations are passing and have addressed any issues that are present:
Example output:
https://github.com/juju4/Azure-Sentinel/actions/runs/4152879216/jobs/7184135632#step:3:37