You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How usfm_grammar 3.x would behave if we gave it a random text file?
Can we do some checks like, if no \id found in the first 3 content lines of the file, then bail?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Where the ID line is (theoretically) parsed into variables
Var
Example
Definitiion [spec] (data form)
id (&)
(all)
Project ID-complete field
id0 (&)
AAA
Project ID-Book ID [USFM]
id1 (&)
BBB
Project ID-ISO639 Language [p.sfm]
id2 (&)
CC
Project ID-ISO3166 Country [p.sfm]
id3 (&)
DDD
Project ID-Tagging Language [p.sfm]
id4 (&)
EEE
Project ID-Acronym (3Letter) [p.sfm]
id5 (&)
FFF
Project ID Title [p.sfm]
id6 (&)
GGG
Project ID Text Freeze Date [p.sfm]
id7 (&)
HHH
Project ID Rights Code [p.sfm] (creative commons)
id8 (&)
KKK
Project ID Rights Owner [p.sfm] (of final work)
id9 (&)
LLL
Project ID Status Level [p.sfm] (1-7 p.sfm publishing status, not 1-3 USFM community acceptance.)
So, specifically to USFM conformance:
If exactly "(USFM)" is found before the first dash on the ID line, then the work should conform to the USFM standard listed with the \usfm tag, or USFM 2.5 if no \usfm tag is found.
This affects linking, tables and images.
Links \jmp are only intra-document.
Tables (\tr#) will have no preceeding definition \rem or closing \b tags, and will fail somewhat gracefully as blue text paragraphs instead.
Images will have no print/display size information embedded into them.
Thank you @cmahte for sharing this! I could not, however, find any official documentation to support this syntax specification. Is this something Paratext (or some such software) does? If so, could you point to the documentation?
How usfm_grammar 3.x would behave if we gave it a random text file?
Can we do some checks like, if no \id found in the first 3 content lines of the file, then bail?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: