Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Internal] [Test] Test Out Raw Reads (FASTQ) and .GZ Files #133

Closed
1 task done
ankushkgupta2 opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
1 task done

[Internal] [Test] Test Out Raw Reads (FASTQ) and .GZ Files #133

ankushkgupta2 opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@ankushkgupta2
Copy link
Contributor

Please Provide a Description of the Testing Request.
Need to test out user pointing to a single .GZ fasta file:

  • unzips it
  • assigns the paths in the metadata file to sample with matching name, if cannot be found, throws an error

Need to test out .FASTQ formatted file

Place an ❌ in a Box that Best Matches the Test Request's Importance:

  • [] 1 - Urgent (absolutely integral and core-functionlaity of the codebase is completely compromised without this test)
  • 2 - Most Important (codebase can be used for some core-functions but the test needs to be executed for some)
  • [] 3-4 - Moderate (codebase can be used for all core-functions but the test needs to be exexcuted for some other ones)
  • [] 5 - Least important (would like to see but there are no stringent expectations nor urgency for current/future use-cases) 

Any Additional Context or Information? Has There Been Any Progress Made So Far Towards this Request? Any Helpful Resources to Reference? Screenshots or Links?
N/A

@jessicarowell
Copy link
Collaborator

Closed because pipeline has been significantly refactored since this time

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants