Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Internal] [Feature] Enhance Metadata Validation #138

Open
1 task done
ankushkgupta2 opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

[Internal] [Feature] Enhance Metadata Validation #138

ankushkgupta2 opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request implement

Comments

@ankushkgupta2
Copy link
Contributor

What is the Feature Related To? Please Provide a Description.
Need to enhance capability for metadata validation to do the following (based on findings during beta testing):

  • cases where a value for 'collection_date' is provided that does not contain dashes in it, need to be recorded in the error log + potential program stoppage (need to double check if this formatting is required for certain NCBI databases)
  • the 'host' field needs to be checked and populated with 'not included' if empty

Place an ❌ in a Box that Best Matches the Feature's Importance:

  • [] 1 - Most important (absolutely integral and will not use codebase at all without it)
  • 2-4 - Moderate (still using codebase for other functions but is serving as a blocker for future use-cases)
  • [] 5 - Least important (would like to see but there are no stringent expectations nor urgency for current/future use-cases) 

Any Additional Context or Information? Has There Been Any Progress Made So Far Towards this Request? Any Helpful Resources to Reference? Screenshots or Links?
N/A

@ankushkgupta2 ankushkgupta2 added enhancement New feature or request implement labels Jan 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request implement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant