You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the Feature Related To? Please Provide a Description.
Need to enhance capability for metadata validation to do the following (based on findings during beta testing):
cases where a value for 'collection_date' is provided that does not contain dashes in it, need to be recorded in the error log + potential program stoppage (need to double check if this formatting is required for certain NCBI databases)
the 'host' field needs to be checked and populated with 'not included' if empty
Place an ❌ in a Box that Best Matches the Feature's Importance:
[] 1 - Most important (absolutely integral and will not use codebase at all without it)
2-4 - Moderate (still using codebase for other functions but is serving as a blocker for future use-cases)
[] 5 - Least important (would like to see but there are no stringent expectations nor urgency for current/future use-cases)
Any Additional Context or Information? Has There Been Any Progress Made So Far Towards this Request? Any Helpful Resources to Reference? Screenshots or Links?
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What is the Feature Related To? Please Provide a Description.
Need to enhance capability for metadata validation to do the following (based on findings during beta testing):
Place an ❌ in a Box that Best Matches the Feature's Importance:
Any Additional Context or Information? Has There Been Any Progress Made So Far Towards this Request? Any Helpful Resources to Reference? Screenshots or Links?
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: