You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the guide seems to imply that NULL pointer is always represented with untagged all-zeroes value at:
Therefore, we have considered other options for
revocation, including tag-preserving \emph{permission}-zeroing (but tag
preservation) and wholesale replacement with \cconst{NULL} (i.e., the untagged
all~zero value).
If that's correct to assume in general that NULL pointer should be (or expected to be) represented with untagged all-zeroes value, would it be possible to explicitly state that in the guide?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the guide seems to imply that NULL pointer is always represented with untagged all-zeroes value at:
If that's correct to assume in general that NULL pointer should be (or expected to be) represented with untagged all-zeroes value, would it be possible to explicitly state that in the guide?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: