Questions about verification of new energy equipment #434
Replies: 3 comments 6 replies
-
I have not created PSS/E files to verify the kundur_wtdta1 case. I would appreciate it and provide guidance if you would like to contribute. It is the same |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It would be very helpful if you could take on it.
You might start from the same power flow solution and use converter models, namely, REGCA1, and REECA1. REECA2 has many control flags, and starting with the ones with basic functionality can simplify the process. After matching the results, you can then add the models for wind generators.
Most of the time, the mismatches are due to parameters and limiters. Enabling the minimum necessary control flags can help to reduce the number of affecting parameters. For limiters, it’s usually okay to ignore them first by setting a very large range.
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
…________________________________
From: xjlcode ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2023 9:26:00 PM
To: CURENT/andes ***@***.***>
Cc: Hantao Cui ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [CURENT/andes] Questions about verification of new energy equipment (Discussion #434)
Yes, it seems like you did not verify renewable energy model in PSS/E because i have not seen the .dyr files. I am trying to verify it by debugging model parameters of andes and PSS/E.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#434 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABSNZA6SUWXP2LTIW2FTFHLW6Y6DRANCNFSM6AAAAAAWLW2JCM>.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I seem to have found the answer to the problem: the initial voltage and phase of the raw file and xlsx file in the kundur folder do not match, resulting in the initial non-convergence problem. And I checked that the initial voltage and phase of the two files in the ieee14 folder are consistent. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Dear Dr.Cui,
I have a small question regarding your renewable energy model while using Andes recently. Specifically, I'm wondering if I can validate your model's correctness in PSS/E regarding kundur_wtdta1. This is because I haven't seen any .raw or .dyr files that contain new energy equipment in your model.
My question is that I changed one generator in the Kundur system to a wind turbine in PSS/E version 35.3, just like your Excel spreadsheet, but I cannot get the same results as Andes. So Could you please give me some advice on it?
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions