Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup a better Dual Licensing #4

Open
Clankcoll opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Setup a better Dual Licensing #4

Clankcoll opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Clankcoll
Copy link
Owner

Clankcoll commented Mar 4, 2024

No worries guys i want everyone who is not a Company every private or better said every non Commercial use u can use this as your own modified version yes no doesn't matter like a full Open Source Project for Private Users but if a Company wants to use this tool they should either pay a the Main Distributor (me) either a Licensing fee or "support" fee if they want to use it in their company.

Thats why i need to look more into Licensing the Licence which is out there RN is the one which applies until i know what would be best for me to do and to have. Maybe i keep this project whole in a MIT Structure but sure is, if anyone wants to resell it i want royaltes or a small %-fee of the amount earned or i am going to give out as a support service

@Clankcoll Clankcoll self-assigned this Mar 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant