Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add implicit tendency for canopy temperature #675

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

kmdeck
Copy link
Member

@kmdeck kmdeck commented Jun 24, 2024

Purpose

Add implicit tendency for canopy temperature
Address #696

Previously, all canopy variables were stepped explicitly. Now temperature
is stepped implicitly in both standalone CanopyModel runs and integrated
SoilCanopyModel runs. Changes include adding a jacobian and implicit
tendency for the CanopyModel, and updating scripts to use ImEx steppers.
We've also added scripts to test convergence behavior of the standalone
and integrated cases, which are output as plots on buildkite.

This change increases the stability of our global
SoilCanopyModel runs, decreasing the number of NaNs we see, and allows
us to take timesteps of 450s.

Notes

There are two things we dont understand about this change:

  • there seem to be some times during the simultation where the error is always large, and a smaller dt doesnt help. For example, the 99th percentile error curve dips below the mean error for small dt, which indicates there are outliers that are very large in the top 1% error
    • update 9/18: it's possible this may happen during times in the simulation where temperature is changing a lot, e.g. shortly after a driver update, as opposed to when the temperature is in equilibrium. See plots in comments for more information
  • the derivative of SHF with respect to temperature is correct to a few percent, but the derivative of LHF with respect to temeperature is ~30% wrong. This is partly due to d_qsat/d_T errors (but Ive double checked that I entered the formula correct), but seems like it is also due to d_LHF/d_qsat. I think I have followed CLM exactly. Not sure why the error is large.

These two questions will be investigated in a later PR - see #782

Results

With an explicit stepper, RK4, a test script at the Ozark site with the canopy alone permits dt = 60 [ac_canopy = 1e3]. Time to solution = 114 seconds - see kd/canopy_explicit_tests branch. Using dt = 180 fails.
With an implicit stepper ARS111, updated jacobian every newton iteration, max_iters = 6, the same simulation can be run with dt=3600. Time to solution = 16 seconds. Using only a single iteration failed.

Accuracy as a function of timestep (ref solution = dt = 6, implicit solver)
Float 32:
errors_f32
Float64:
errors_f64

In the global long run, on this branch: kd/canopy_explicit_global_nans I just changed the value of ac_canopy but left everything else the same as #main - i.e. using an explicit solver. The resulting map is almost entirely NaN [ look at time 86400]

On the implicit branch (this PR), we have no NaNs after one day. [ look at time 86400]

To-do

  • Merge ClimaCore Branch
  • Test timestep improvement
  • Unit test Jacobian
  • Cleanup canopy timestep_test.jl
  • Add script to show soil/canopy convergence (analogous to canopy timestep_test.jl) - add to buildkite pipeline
  • Rebase
  • Check longruns
  • Review

Content

  • Adds canopy temp to the list of implicitly stepped variables
  • Adds the canopy jacobian
  • Adds the canopy implicit tendency
  • updates scripts and some timesteps
  • adds a script testing timestep convergence, adds to buildkite
  • update docs Manifest to ClimaCore 0.14.11

  • I have read and checked the items on the review checklist.

experiments/long_runs/land.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kmdeck kmdeck requested a review from dennisYatunin August 15, 2024 20:26
@kmdeck kmdeck force-pushed the kd/canopy_temp_implicit branch 3 times, most recently from 8323271 to f754df6 Compare August 19, 2024 18:14
@kmdeck kmdeck requested a review from Sbozzolo August 19, 2024 23:37
Copy link
Member

@dennisYatunin dennisYatunin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes look good overall, but I have some concerns about the reliability of the tests. The current test results indicate that there are significant errors in the Jacobian approximation, but these errors might appear bigger than they actually are if there is a problem with the reference solutions. This issue can be dealt with in future PRs, though; the new infrastructure added here is fine to merge in.

test/standalone/Vegetation/canopy_model.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
src/shared_utilities/implicit_timestepping.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/shared_utilities/implicit_timestepping.jl Show resolved Hide resolved

# Set up timestepper
timestepper = CTS.ARS343();
timestepper = CTS.ARS111();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you encounter some sort of issue with the ARS343 timestepper here (and in other experiments), or did you just switch to IMEX Euler for convenience?

@AlexisRenchon AlexisRenchon mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2024
36 tasks
@juliasloan25 juliasloan25 force-pushed the kd/canopy_temp_implicit branch from ed80730 to c638d87 Compare September 6, 2024 20:40
@juliasloan25 juliasloan25 force-pushed the kd/canopy_temp_implicit branch 3 times, most recently from 96f433e to 054a561 Compare September 25, 2024 23:12
experiments/long_runs/land.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
experiments/long_runs/land.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AlexisRenchon AlexisRenchon force-pushed the kd/canopy_temp_implicit branch from 28fce25 to d73fd6a Compare October 3, 2024 17:14
@juliasloan25 juliasloan25 force-pushed the kd/canopy_temp_implicit branch 2 times, most recently from 374a09e to 18d44f5 Compare October 3, 2024 18:42
@juliasloan25 juliasloan25 force-pushed the kd/canopy_temp_implicit branch 2 times, most recently from 737e138 to 2a953cb Compare October 3, 2024 21:07
kmdeck and others added 3 commits October 3, 2024 15:32
Previously, all canopy variables were stepped explicitly. Now temperature
is stepped implicitly in both standalone CanopyModel runs and integrated
SoilCanopyModel runs. Changes include adding a jacobian and implicit
tendency for the CanopyModel, and updating scripts to use ImEx steppers.
We've also added scripts to test convergence behavior of the standalone
and integrated cases, which are output as plots on buildkite.

This change increases the stability of our global
SoilCanopyModel runs, decreasing the number of NaNs we see, and allows
us to take timesteps of 450s.
@juliasloan25 juliasloan25 force-pushed the kd/canopy_temp_implicit branch from 2a953cb to 32312bd Compare October 4, 2024 00:09
@juliasloan25 juliasloan25 enabled auto-merge October 4, 2024 00:30
@juliasloan25 juliasloan25 merged commit 6d67331 into main Oct 4, 2024
10 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request LSMv1 performance improve performance Run long runs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implicit timestepper for canopy temperature or solve flux balance equation
5 participants