rcc.ttl is all wrong

[VladimirAlexiev]

Continuing the examination from #3:

• again the : prefix is missing, so rcc.ttl is invalid
• what's the purpose of using xsd:anyURI literals rather than actual URIs?
• You say :Catalog :dataset :dataset481, :dataset_x001 but you have not defined such property. Thinking about dcat: doesn't magically bring its props into your namespace
• You say :Corpus :publication :publication338, :publication340 but you have not defined such property

We've done significant work in KGs of Science so the following recommendations come from that experience:

• authors and publications: use separate props to capture identifiers in important datasets like ORCID, DOI, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Scopus. Eg Wikidata has external-ids for all of that
• publications: use some established bibliographic ontology, don't just wing it with dc/dct
• If you use DCT for a bunch of props, why suddenly switch to PAV for pav:createdOn? Use dct:created
• dct:alternative is declared subprop of dct:title, so you'll get two dct:title: "National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey" and "NHANES", is that what you want?

[Juliaingridlane]

Thank you so much for these very helpful comments. We will review and reply to you shortly Julia Lane Professor, Wagner, NYU and the Coleridge Initiative Cell phone: 646 208 4990 https://coleridgeinitiative.org *From:* Vladimir Alexiev <notifications@github.com> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 7, 2020 4:20 AM *To:* Coleridge-Initiative/adrf-onto <adrf-onto@noreply.github.com> *Cc:* Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com> *Subject:* [Coleridge-Initiative/adrf-onto] rcc.ttl is all wrong (#4) Continuing the examination from #3 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_Coleridge-2DInitiative_adrf-2Donto_issues_3&d=DwMCaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=omwcNBUqPba9pikmkXZXk2bFQ7zxZPhI5OH9dd8lFDA&m=nvEXwdXX6w2ZZawQ2sFqmIeqwMZMuyPLmV9k9zNWzSM&s=gXhpnwOwDVbOiM1q0T15Q5ZzKbaZfrj9EIBWZSL4soU&e=> : - again the : prefix is missing, so rcc.ttl is invalid - what's the purpose of using xsd:anyURI literals rather than actual URIs? - You say :Catalog :dataset :dataset481, :dataset_x001 but you have not defined such property. Thinking about dcat: doesn't magically bring its props into your namespace - :Corpus :publication :publication338, :publication340 but you have not defined such property We've done significant work in KGs of Science so the following recommendations come from that experience: - authors and publications: use separate props to capture identifiers in important datasets like ORCID, DOI, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Scopus. Eg Wikidata has external-ids for all of that - publications: use some established bibliographic ontology, don't just wing it with dc/dct - If you use DCT for a bunch of props, why suddenly switch to PAV for pav:createdOn? Use dct:created - dct:alternative is declared subprop of dct:title, so you'll get two dct:title: "National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey"@en <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_en&d=DwMCaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=omwcNBUqPba9pikmkXZXk2bFQ7zxZPhI5OH9dd8lFDA&m=nvEXwdXX6w2ZZawQ2sFqmIeqwMZMuyPLmV9k9zNWzSM&s=X9UqrMQ0P7B86XMYKuO-Fgd8TJVvOKXfUNoa-FIQJ9I&e=> and "NHANES"@en <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_en&d=DwMCaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=omwcNBUqPba9pikmkXZXk2bFQ7zxZPhI5OH9dd8lFDA&m=nvEXwdXX6w2ZZawQ2sFqmIeqwMZMuyPLmV9k9zNWzSM&s=X9UqrMQ0P7B86XMYKuO-Fgd8TJVvOKXfUNoa-FIQJ9I&e=>, is that what you want? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_Coleridge-2DInitiative_adrf-2Donto_issues_4&d=DwMCaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=omwcNBUqPba9pikmkXZXk2bFQ7zxZPhI5OH9dd8lFDA&m=nvEXwdXX6w2ZZawQ2sFqmIeqwMZMuyPLmV9k9zNWzSM&s=PvDMKdpBLo5Jl3_hpKHhgnGZXuoA_3258hmvtmuvi6k&e=>, or unsubscribe <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_AD63AO4COBKS7GFJCKGLZ33SJQQCNANCNFSM4SHB7A3Q&d=DwMCaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=omwcNBUqPba9pikmkXZXk2bFQ7zxZPhI5OH9dd8lFDA&m=nvEXwdXX6w2ZZawQ2sFqmIeqwMZMuyPLmV9k9zNWzSM&s=Tc8Kbu1hf4uB8Z31OZUa4ZJYULOEZWZ21VWfTZCpFzU&e=> .

[el2727]

Dear Vladimir,

Thank you very much for your very helpful comments, we reviewed, and noted them for the future development.

Thank you again.