Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] #939

Closed
S0ly opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 10 comments
Closed

[Feature] #939

S0ly opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 10 comments
Labels
Feature Adding a new feature, or substantial improvements on existing functionality

Comments

@S0ly
Copy link
Member

S0ly commented Apr 3, 2024

Feature Description

I would like an option so that the price per hours or month or a product not UP it different of wen its DOWN so it can encourage people to not keep product UP if they have no reason for

Solution Idea

it would be nice to have an option for the price wen the product is UP and the price wen the product is DOWN

Additional Info

if its possible of course ;p thanks !

@S0ly S0ly added the Feature Adding a new feature, or substantial improvements on existing functionality label Apr 3, 2024
@sybetjeh
Copy link

sybetjeh commented Apr 3, 2024

This makes no sense, since Pterodactyl will not give those resources back if a server is offline. It's literally impossible for us to implement, without making obnoxious workarounds that we don't want to.

@S0ly
Copy link
Member Author

S0ly commented Apr 3, 2024

the ram in ptero can be over allocated and the CPU is not assigned so if something is down the CPU core are free for maybe other services so it makes totally senses

not only it help client to not lose too many money
but it can even enable a server to make more money than planned
its a win - win situation and it should not be too difficult to implement

@sybetjeh
Copy link

sybetjeh commented Apr 3, 2024

If you want it, you can do dev4hire and implement it that way. This is unlikely to get implemented in core CPGG.

@S0ly
Copy link
Member Author

S0ly commented Apr 3, 2024

that's sad that many people requested it but its still being refused for no good reason

@S0ly
Copy link
Member Author

S0ly commented Apr 3, 2024

pterodactyl already handle this type of situation so why not cpgg

@sybetjeh
Copy link

sybetjeh commented Apr 3, 2024

I'm not going to recite every reason, you can view the original request here: #757

@S0ly
Copy link
Member Author

S0ly commented Apr 3, 2024

the issue have not really been closed seing the conversation they are just wondering how to implement it

@sybetjeh
Copy link

sybetjeh commented Apr 3, 2024

Sir, it's been open since last year. A miracle will need to happen for core contributors coding it, pushing it to the dev branch, testing it and then merging it to production

@S0ly
Copy link
Member Author

S0ly commented Apr 3, 2024

yep that's the magic of open source ;p

@sybetjeh
Copy link

sybetjeh commented Apr 3, 2024

Duplicate of #757

@sybetjeh sybetjeh marked this as a duplicate of #757 Apr 3, 2024
@sybetjeh sybetjeh closed this as completed Apr 3, 2024
@sybetjeh sybetjeh closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Apr 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Adding a new feature, or substantial improvements on existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants