You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have noticed that the timestamp representation in the XML and JSON BOM files is inconsistent. While both formats are ISO 8601 conform, the XML BOM file contains a timestamp with a precision of up to 7 decimal places for the seconds fraction:
XML: 2024-05-17T15:50:31.6823708+00:00
JSON: 2024-05-17T15:50:31Z
In my opinion, this level of precision is not necessary. Furthermore, the second fractions more than 3 digits are not supported by the Python API datetime.fromisoformat(date_string) method.
While these differences are not incorrect, they can be confusing and may cause issues when processing the data. I would like to propose that we adopt a consistent timestamp representation across both file formats, ideally using the JSON timestamp format.
Thank you for considering this issue!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have noticed that the timestamp representation in the XML and JSON BOM files is inconsistent. While both formats are ISO 8601 conform, the XML BOM file contains a timestamp with a precision of up to 7 decimal places for the seconds fraction:
In my opinion, this level of precision is not necessary. Furthermore, the second fractions more than 3 digits are not supported by the Python API datetime.fromisoformat(date_string) method.
While these differences are not incorrect, they can be confusing and may cause issues when processing the data. I would like to propose that we adopt a consistent timestamp representation across both file formats, ideally using the JSON timestamp format.
Thank you for considering this issue!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: