Impactomatrix.bib

@article{stiller_anforderungen_2016,
	title = {Anforderungen ermitteln, Lösungen evaluieren und Erfolge messen – Begleitforschung in {DARIAH}-{DE}},
	volume = {40},
	issn = {0341-4183},
	url = {https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bfup.2016.40.issue-2/bfp-2016-0025/bfp-2016-0025.xml?format=INT},
	doi = {10.1515/bfp-2016-0025},
	abstract = {{DARIAH}-{DE} unterstützt Geistes- und Kulturwissenschaftler mit Digital-Humanities-Tools und fachwissenschaftlichen Diensten in den Bereichen Forschung und Lehre. Der nachfolgende Artikel beschreibt die Arbeit und die Ergebnisse der wissenschaftlichen Begleitforschung innerhalb {DARIAH}-{DE}. Die Wissenschaftliche Begleitforschung hat die Aufgabe, Kriterien zu entwickeln, mit denen eine Bewertung der im Projekt entwickelten Komponenten vorgenommen werden kann. Dies geschieht in der Aufbauphase des Projektes, um erfolgreiche Impulse für eine vielversprechende Projektentwicklung geben zu können. Die Wissenschaftliche Begleitforschung gibt auch Anstöße für die erfolgreiche Überführung in den Produktivbetrieb. Grundlegend für die Arbeit ist dabei die Auseinandersetzung mit dem geisteswissenschaftlichen Forschungsablauf und den Bedürfnissen der Fachwissenschaftler. Dazu zählt auch die Entwicklung bedienbarer und nutzerfreundlicher Werkzeuge und Infrastrukturkomponenten.},
	pages = {250--258},
	number = {2},
	journaltitle = {Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis},
	author = {Stiller, Juliane and Gnadt, Timo and Romanello, Matteo and Thoden, Klaus},
	urldate = {2016-08-09},
	date = {2016},
	file = {Stiller_etal_2016_Anforderungen_ermitteln,_Lösungen_evaluieren_und_Erfolge_messen_–.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Juliane Stiller/Anforderungen ermitteln, Losungen evaluieren und Erfolge messen - Begleitforschung in DARIAH-DE (500)/Anforderungen ermitteln, Losungen evaluier - Juliane Stiller.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@report{buddenbohm_erfolgskriterien_2014,
	location = {Göttingen},
	title = {Erfolgskriterien für den Aufbau und nachhaltigen Betrieb Virtueller Forschungsumgebungen},
	url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-dariah-2014-5-4},
	number = {7},
	institution = {Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen},
	author = {Buddenbohm, Stefan and Enke, Harry and Hoffmann, Matthias and Klar, Jochen and Neuroth, Heike and Schwiegelshohn, Uwe},
	date = {2014},
	file = {2014_Erfolgskriterien_für_den_Aufbau_und_nachhaltigen_Betrieb_Virtueller.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Stefan Buddenbohm/Erfolgskriterien fur den Aufbau und nachhaltigen Betrieb Virtueller Forschungsumgebungen (526)/Erfolgskriterien fur den Aufbau und nachha - Stefan Buddenbohm.pdf:application/pdf;DNB, Katalog der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek:/Users/kthoden/Zotero/storage/5NPWS3RU/opac.htm\;jsessionid=FE760F5C88BCEE384303386F738D075F.html:text/html}
}

@report{brown_repah:_2006,
	location = {De Montfort University Leicester and The University of Sheffield},
	title = {{RePAH}: A User Requirements Analysis for Portals in the Arts and Humanities.},
	url = {http://repah.dmu.ac.uk/report/pdfs/RePAHReport-Complete.pdf},
	author = {Brown, Stephen and Ross, Robb and Gerrad, David and Greengrass, Mark and Bryson, Jared},
	urldate = {2015-11-24},
	date = {2006},
	file = {Brown_etal_2006_RePAH.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Stephen Brown/RePAH_ A User Requirements Analysis for Portals in the Arts and Humanities (577)/RePAH_ A User Requirements Analysis for Po - Stephen Brown.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@report{bulatovic_usability_2016,
	location = {Göttingen},
	title = {Usability von {DH}-Tools und -Services ({DARIAH}2 R 1.2.3)},
	url = {https://wiki.de.dariah.eu/download/attachments/14651583/AP1.2.3_Usability_von_DH-Tools_und-Services_final.pdf},
	pages = {Deutsch},
	number = {1.2.3},
	author = {Bulatovic, Natasa and Gnadt, Timo and Romanello, Matteo and Schmitt, Viola and Stiller, Juliane and Thoden, Klaus},
	date = {2016},
	file = {Bulatovic_etal_2016_Usability_von_DH-Tools_und_-Services_(R_1.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Natasa Bulatovic/Usability von DH-Tools und -Services (DARIAH2 R 1.2.3) (579)/Usability von DH-Tools und -Services (DARI - Natasa Bulatovic.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@unpublished{fandrych_wer_2016,
	location = {Leipzig},
	title = {Wer bist Du, Nutzer?},
	url = {http://www.dhd2016.de/abstracts/vortr%C3%A4ge-053.html},
	author = {Fandrych, Christian and Frick, Elena and Hedeland, Hanna and Iliash, Anna and Jettka, Daniel and Meißner, Cordula and Schmidt, Thomas and Wallner, Franziska and Weigert, Kathrin},
	urldate = {2016-11-16},
	date = {2016-03-07},
	file = {Snapshot:/Users/kthoden/Zotero/storage/G55U4KSG/vorträge-053.html:text/html}
}

@report{gnadt_umfrage_2014,
	location = {Göttingen},
	title = {Umfrage zu Erfolgskriterien ({DARIAH}2 R 1.3.1)},
	url = {https://wiki.de.dariah.eu/download/attachments/14651583/R%201.3.1%20-%20Erhebung%20einer%20Nutzerbefragung%20zu%20Nutzererwartungen%20und%20-kriterien.pdf},
	pages = {Deutsch},
	number = {1.3.1},
	author = {Gnadt, Timo and Stiller, Juliane and Höckendorff, Mareike},
	date = {2014},
	file = {Gnadt_etal_2016_Umfrage_zu_Erfolgskriterien_(R_1.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Timo Gnadt/Umfrage zu Erfolgskriterien (R 1.3.1) (593)/Umfrage zu Erfolgskriterien (R 1.3.1) - Timo Gnadt.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@report{gnadt_finale_2016,
	location = {Göttingen},
	title = {Finale Version Erfolgskriterien ({DARIAH}2 R 1.3.3)},
	url = {https://wiki.de.dariah.eu/download/attachments/14651583/R133_Erfolgskriterien_Konsortium.pdf},
	pages = {Deutsch},
	number = {1.3.3},
	author = {Gnadt, Timo and Stiller, Juliane and Thoden, Klaus and Schmitt, Viola},
	date = {2016},
	file = {Gnadt_etal_2016_Finale_Version_Erfolgskriterien_(R_1.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Timo Gnadt/Finale Version Erfolgskriterien (DARIAH2 R1.3.3) (592)/Finale Version Erfolgskriterien (DARIAH2 R - Timo Gnadt.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@thesis{rose_chancen_2015,
	location = {Berlin},
	title = {Chancen und Grenzen der Abbildung fachspezifischer Forschungsprozesse durch eine virtuelle Forschungsumgebung in den Geisteswissenschaften},
	institution = {Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin},
	type = {Masterarbeit},
	author = {Rose, Corinna},
	date = {2015},
	file = {Rose_2015_Chancen_und_Grenzen_der_Abbildung_fachspezifischer_Forschungsprozesse_durch.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Corinna Rose/Chancen und Grenzen der Abbildung fachspezifischer Forschungsprozesse durch eine virtuelle Fors (556)/Chancen und Grenzen der Abbildung fachspez - Corinna Rose.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@report{stiller_nutzungsverhalten_2015,
	title = {Nutzungsverhalten in den Digital Humanities ({DARIAH}2 R1.2.1/M 7.6)},
	url = {https://wiki.de.dariah.eu/download/attachments/14651583/Report1.2.1-final3.pdf},
	number = {R1.2.1},
	institution = {{DARIAH}-{DE}},
	author = {Stiller, Juliane and Thoden, Klaus and Leganovic, Oona and Heise, Christian and Höckendorf, Mareike and Gnadt, Timo},
	date = {2015},
	file = {Stiller_etal_Nutzungsverhalten_in_den_Digital_Humanities.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Juliane Stiller/Nutzungsverhalten in den Digital Humanities (DARIAH2 R 1.2.1_ M 7.6) (502)/Nutzungsverhalten in den Digital Humanitie - Juliane Stiller.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@report{warwick_lairah_2006,
	title = {The {LAIRAH} Project: Log Analysis of Digital Resources in the Arts and Humanities - Final Report to the Arts and Humanities Research Council},
	url = {http://www.ucl.ac.uk/infostudies/claire-warwick/publications/LAIRAHreport.pdf},
	shorttitle = {The {LAIRAH} Project},
	author = {Warwick, Claire and Terras, Melissa and Huntington, Paul and Pappa, Nikoleta and Galina, Isabel},
	urldate = {2015-11-24},
	date = {2006},
	file = {Warwick_etal_2006_The_LAIRAH_Project.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Claire Warwick/The LAIRAH Project_ Log Analysis of Digital Resources in the Arts and Humanities Final Report t (589)/The LAIRAH Project_ Log Analysis of Digita - Claire Warwick.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@article{talja_reasons_2003,
	title = {Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines},
	volume = {59},
	doi = {10.1108/00220410310506312},
	shorttitle = {Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases},
	abstract = {Previous research has shown that there are major differences in the search methods used in different disciplines, and that the use of electronic journals and databases likewise varies according to domain. Previous studies have not, however, explored whether, or how, this variation is possibly related to factors such as domain size, the degree of scatter in a domain or domain-specific relevance criteria. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the development of a domain analytic approach for explaining the use and non-use of e-journals and databases. We identify and define factors to account for disciplinary differences in e-journal use, outline hypotheses to be tested more rigorously in future research, and test them initially on a limited data set. The empirical data was gathered as a part of a wider qualitative study exploring scholars' use of networked resources in four different disciplines: nursing science, literature/cultural studies, history and ecological environmental science. The findings suggest that e-journals and databases are likely to be used most heavily in fields in which directed searching is the dominant search method and topical relevance the primary relevance type, and less infields in which browsing and chaining are the dominant search methods and paradigmatic relevance the primary relevance type. The findings also support the Bates hypothesis that domain size has an important impact on the search methods used.},
	pages = {673--691},
	number = {6},
	journaltitle = {Journal of Documentation},
	author = {Talja, S. and Maula, H.},
	date = {2003},
	keywords = {Electronic journals, Information retrieval, research, Searching},
	file = {Talja_Maula_2003_Reasons_for_the_use_and_non-use_of_electronic_journals_and_databases.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Sanna Talja/Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases (561)/Reasons for the use and non-use of electro - Sanna Talja.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@report{miller_jisc_2010,
	title = {{JISC} {VRE} Programme: Impact  Study},
	url = {http://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/JISC_UK/J100315M.pdf},
	author = {Miller, Paul},
	urldate = {2015-11-24},
	date = {2010},
	file = {Miller_2010_JISC_VRE_Programme.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Paul Miller/JISC VRE Impact Study (583)/JISC VRE Impact Study - Paul Miller.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@article{gatzke_akzeptanzanalyse_2014,
	title = {Akzeptanzanalyse der virtuellen Forschungsumgebung von Edumeres.net},
	volume = {65},
	doi = {doi:10.1515/iwp-2014-0045},
	pages = {215--304},
	number = {4},
	journaltitle = {Information - Wissenschaft \& Praxis,},
	author = {Gätzke, N. and {Mandl, T.} and {Strötgen, R.}},
	date = {2014},
	file = {Gätzke,_N._etal_2014_Akzeptanzanalyse_der_virtuellen_Forschungsumgebung_von_Edumeres.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Natalia Gatzke/Akzeptanzanalyse der virtuellen Forschungsumgebung von Edumeres.net (608)/Akzeptanzanalyse der virtuellen Forschungs - Natalia Gatzke.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@article{ahmad_performance_2012,
	title = {Performance Indicators for the Advancement of Malaysian Research with Focus on Social Science and Humanities},
	volume = {68},
	issn = {1877-0428},
	doi = {10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.203},
	pages = {16--28},
	journaltitle = {Aice-Bs 2012 Cairo (asia Pacific International Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies)},
	author = {Ahmad, Sabarinah Sh},
	editor = {Abbas, M. Y.},
	date = {2012},
	note = {{WOS}:000323429000002},
	file = {Ahmad_2012_Performance_Indicators_for_the_Advancement_of_Malaysian_Research_with_Focus_on.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Sabarinah Sh Ahmad/Performance Indicators for the Advancement of Malaysian Research with Focus on Social Science a (489)/Performance Indicators for the Advancement - Sabarinah Sh Ahmad.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@report{warwick_evaluating_2007,
	title = {Evaluating Digital Humanities Resources: The {LAIRAH} Project Checklist and the Internet Shakespeare Editions Project},
	url = {http://elpub.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?144_elpub2007},
	shorttitle = {Evaluating Digital Humanities Resources},
	abstract = {The following paper presents a case study of the way that the research done by the {LAIRAH} project may be applied in the case of a real digital resource for humanities scholarship. We present an evaluation of the Internet Shakespeare Editions website according to the checklist of recommendations which we produced as a result of our research. The {LAIRAH} (Log analysis of Internet Resources in the Arts and Humanities) project based at {UCL}'s School of Library Archive and Information Studies, was a fifteen month study to discover what influences the long-term sustainability and use of digital resources in the humanities through the analysis and evaluation of real-time use. Our research objectives were to determine the scale of use and neglect of digital resources in the humanities, and to determine whether resources that are used share any common characteristics. We also aimed to highlight areas of good practice, as well as aspects of project design that might be improved to aid greater use and sustainability. A further aim was to determine whether digital resources that were neglected. In our study we concluded that well-used projects share common features that predispose them to success. The effect of institutional and disciplinary culture in the construction of digital humanities projects was significant. We found that critical mass was vital, as was prestige within a university or the acceptance of digital methods in a subject. The importance of good project staff and the availability of technical support also proved vital. If a project as to be well-used it was also essential that information about it should be disseminated as widely as possible. Even amongst well-used projects, however we found areas that might be improved, these included organised user testing, the provision of and easy access to documentation and the lack of updating and maintenance of many resources. The paper discusses our recommendations, which were presented as a check-list under four headings: content, users, maintenance and dissemination. We show why our findings led us to make such recommendations, and discuss their application to the {ISE} case study.},
	author = {Warwick, Claire and Terras, Melissa and Galina, Isabel and Huntington, Paul and Pappa, Mikoleta},
	urldate = {2014-08-15},
	date = {2007},
	note = {The following paper presents a case study of the way that the research done by the {LAIRAH} project may be applied in the case of a real digital resource for humanities scholarship. We present an evaluation of the Internet Shakespeare Editions website according to the checklist of recommendations which we produced as a result of our research. The {LAIRAH} (Log analysis of Internet Resources in the Arts and Humanities) project based at {UCL}'s School of Library Archive and Information Studies, was a fifteen month study to discover what influences the long-term sustainability and use of digital resources in the humanities through the analysis and evaluation of real-time use. Our research objectives were to determine the scale of use and neglect of digital resources in the humanities, and to determine whether resources that are used share any common characteristics. We also aimed to highlight areas of good practice, as well as aspects of project design that might be improved to aid greater use and sustainability. A further aim was to determine whether digital resources that were neglected. In our study we concluded that well-used projects share common features that predispose them to success. The effect of institutional and disciplinary culture in the construction of digital humanities projects was significant. We found that critical mass was vital, as was prestige within a university or the acceptance of digital methods in a subject. The importance of good project staff and the availability of technical support also proved vital. If a project as to be well-used it was also essential that information about it should be disseminated as widely as possible. Even amongst well-used projects, however we found areas that might be improved, these included organised user testing, the provision of and easy access to documentation and the lack of updating and maintenance of many resources. The paper discusses our recommendations, which were presented as a check-list under four headings: content, users, maintenance and dissemination. We show why our findings led us to make such recommendations, and discuss their application to the {ISE} case study.},
	keywords = {digital humanities, good practice resource construction, User studies},
	file = {Warwick_etal_2007_Evaluating_Digital_Humanities_Resources.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Claire Warwick/Evaluating Digital Humanities Resources_ The LAIRAH Project Checklist and the Internet Shakespe (590)/Evaluating Digital Humanities Resources_ T - Claire Warwick.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@inproceedings{suptitz_was_2013,
	title = {Was müssen Virtual Research Environments leisten? - Ein Literaturreview zu den funktionalen und nichtfunktionalen Anforderungen},
	booktitle = {Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings 2013},
	author = {Süptitz, Thomas and Weis, Stephan J.J. and Eymann, Torsten},
	date = {2013},
	file = {Süptitz_etal_Was_müssen_Virtual_Research_Environments_leisten.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Thomas Suptitz/Was mussen Virtual Research Environments leisten_ - Ein Literaturreview zu den funktionalen und (602)/Was mussen Virtual Research Environments l - Thomas Suptitz.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@report{beagrie_value_2014,
	title = {The Value and Impact of Data Sharing and Curation.},
	url = {http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/5568/1/iDF308_-_Digital_Infrastructure_Directions_Report,_Jan14_v1-04.pdf},
	author = {Beagrie, Neil and Houghton, John},
	date = {2014},
	file = {iDF308_-_Digital_Infrastructure_Directions_Report,_Jan14_v1-04.pdf:/Users/kthoden/Zotero/storage/XJZDPPZX/The Value and Impact of Data Sharing and C - Neil Beagrie.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@report{romanello_usability_2016,
	title = {Usability Criteria for External Requests of Collaboration ({DARIAH}2 R 1.2.2/R 7.5)},
	url = {https://wiki.de.dariah.eu/download/attachments/14651583/R1.2.2-7.5_final.pdf},
	author = {Romanello, Matteo and Stiller, Juliane and Thoden, Klaus},
	date = {2016}
}

@article{toms_understanding_2008,
	title = {Understanding the information and communication technology needs of the e-humanist},
	volume = {64},
	pages = {102--130},
	number = {1},
	journaltitle = {Journal of Documentation},
	author = {Toms, Elaine G and O'Brien, Heather L},
	date = {2008},
	keywords = {communication   technologies, databases, electronic media, humanistic philosophy, online searching project, research, scholars, Software, Survey, workbench},
	file = {Understanding the information and communic - Elaine G. Toms.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Elaine G. Toms/Understanding the information and communication technology needs of the e-humanist (730)/Understanding the information and communic - Elaine G. Toms.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@article{klein_evaluation_2008,
	title = {Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research},
	volume = {35},
	issn = {0749-3797, 1873-2607},
	url = {http://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(08)00420-0/abstract},
	doi = {10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010},
	abstract = {Abstract
Interdisciplinarity has become a widespread mantra for research, accompanied by a growing body of publications. Evaluation, however, remains one of the least-understood aspects. This review of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research evaluation categorizes lessons from the emergent international literature on the topic reviewed in 2007. It defines parallels between research performance and evaluation, presents seven generic principles for evaluation, and reflects in the conclusion on changing connotations of the underlying concepts of discipline, peer, and measurement. Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research performance and evaluation are both generative processes of harvesting, capitalizing, and leveraging multiple expertise. Individual standards must be calibrated, and tensions among different disciplinary, professional, and interdisciplinary approaches carefully managed in balancing acts that require negotiation and compromise. Readiness levels are strengthened by antecedent conditions that are flexible enough to allow multiple pathways of integration and collaboration. In both cases, as well, new epistemic communities must be constructed and new cultures of evidence produced. The multidisciplinary–interdisciplinary–transdisciplinary research environment spans a wide range of contexts. Yet seven generic principles provide a coherent framework for thinking about evaluation: (1) variability of goals; (2) variability of criteria and indicators; (3) leveraging of integration; (4) interaction of social and cognitive factors in collaboration; (5) management, leadership, and coaching; (6) iteration in a comprehensive and transparent system; and (7) effectiveness and impact.},
	pages = {S116--S123},
	number = {2},
	journaltitle = {American Journal of Preventive Medicine},
	shortjournal = {American Journal of Preventive Medicine},
	author = {Klein, Julie T.},
	urldate = {2017-02-24},
	date = {2008-08-01},
	file = {Klein-2008-Evaluation_of_Interdisciplinary_and_Transdisciplinary_Research.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Julie T. Klein/Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research (789)/Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transd - Julie T. Klein.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/kthoden/Zotero/storage/X6QN239V/abstract.html:text/html}
}

@report{bellini_erina+d3.1_2013,
	title = {{ERINA}+D3.1 -e-Infrastructures and Projects Assessment-final version},
	author = {Bellini, Francesco and Navarra, Mauro and Passani, Antonella and Debicki, Marie and Benedict, Josef},
	date = {2013},
	file = {ERINA+D3.1 -e-Infrastructures and Projects Assessment-final version.pdf:/Users/kthoden/Zotero/storage/IAAG4DM6/ERINA_D3.1 -e-Infrastructures and Projects - Francesco Bellini.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@online{bastow_impact_2014,
	title = {The Impact of the Social Sciences - How Academics and their Research Make a Difference},
	url = {https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-impact-of-the-social-sciences/book241492},
	author = {Bastow, Simon and Dunleavy, Patrick and Tinkler, Jane},
	urldate = {2015-12-01},
	date = {2014}
}

@online{bosman_101_2015,
	title = {101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication: How researchers are getting to grip with the myriad of new tools.},
	url = {http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/11/11/101-innovations-in-scholarly-communication/},
	shorttitle = {101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication},
	titleaddon = {Impact of Social Sciences},
	author = {Bosman, Jeroen and Kramer, Bianca},
	date = {2015}
}

@report{european_comission_horizon_2016,
	title = {Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2016-2017},
	url = {http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-infrastructures_en.pdf},
	author = {European Comission},
	date = {2016}
}

@article{garfield_history_2006,
	title = {The history and meaning of the journal impact factor},
	volume = {295},
	url = {http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/jamajif2006.pdf},
	doi = {10.1001/jama.295.1.90},
	pages = {90--93},
	number = {1},
	journaltitle = {Jama},
	author = {Garfield, Eugene},
	date = {2006}
}

@report{garfield_genetics_1963,
	location = {Philadelphia, {PA}.},
	title = {Genetics Citation Index},
	url = {http://www.garfield.library.upenn .edu/essays/v7p515y1984.pdf},
	institution = {Institute for Scientific Information},
	author = {Garfield, Eugene and Sher, Irving H.},
	date = {1963}
}

@article{garfield_citation_1955,
	title = {Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas.},
	volume = {122},
	url = {http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v6p468y1983.pdf},
	doi = {10.1126/science.122.3159.108},
	pages = {108--111},
	number = {3159},
	journaltitle = {Science},
	author = {Garfield, Eugene},
	date = {1955}
}

@report{gnadt_konzept_2015,
	title = {Konzept Report Erfolgskriterien (R 1.3.2)},
	url = {https://wiki.de.dariah.eu/download/attachments/14651583/R%201.3.2%20-%20Konzept%20Report%20Erfolgskriterien.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1427895594871&api=v2},
	institution = {{DARIAH}-{DE}},
	author = {Gnadt, Timo and Stiller, Juliane},
	date = {2015}
}

@report{gnadt_faktoren_2017,
	location = {Göttingen},
	title = {Faktoren und Kriterien für den Impact von {DH}-Tools und Infrastrukturen},
	url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-dariah-2017-1-7},
	number = {21},
	institution = {Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen},
	author = {Gnadt, Timo and Schmitt, Viola and Stiller, Juliane and Thoden, Klaus},
	date = {2017},
	file = {Gnadt et al. - 2017 - Faktoren und Kriterien für den Impact von DH-Tools.pdf:/Users/kthoden/oc_mpiwg/calibre_arbeit/Timo Gnadt/Faktoren und Kriterien fur den Impact von DH-Tools und Infrastrukturen (810)/Gnadt et al. - 2017 - Faktoren und Kriterien für den Impact von DH-Tools.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@article{juola_killer_2008,
	title = {Killer Applications in Digital Humanities},
	volume = {23},
	issn = {0268-1145},
	doi = {10.1093/llc/fqm042},
	abstract = {The emerging discipline of 'digital humanities' has been plagued by a perceived neglect on the part of the broader humanities community. The community as a whole tends not to be aware of the tools developed by {DH} practitioners (as documented by the recent surveys by Siemens et al.), and tends not to take seriously many of the results of scholarship obtained by {DH} methods and tools. This article argues for a focus on deliverable results in the form of useful solutions to common problems that humanities scholars share, instead of simply new representations. The question to address is what needs the humanities community has that can be dealt with using {DH} tools and techniques, or equivalently what incentive humanists have to take up and to use new methods. This can be treated in some respects like the computational quest for the 'killer application'-a need of the user group that can be filled, and by filling it, create an acceptance of that tool and the supporting methods/results. Some definitions and examples are provided both to illustrate the idea and to support why this is necessary. The apparent alternative is the status quo, where digital research tools are brilliantly developed, only to languish in neglect and disuse.},
	pages = {73--83},
	number = {1},
	journaltitle = {Literary and Linguistic Computing},
	shortjournal = {Lit. Linguist. Comput.},
	author = {Juola, Patrick},
	date = {2008-04},
	note = {{WOS}:000207735300008}
}

@book{khandker_handbook_2010,
	location = {Washington, D.C. :},
	title = {Handbook on impact evaluation quantitative methods and practices},
	isbn = {978-0-8213-8029-1},
	publisher = {World Bank},
	author = {Khandker, Shahidur},
	date = {2010}
}

@report{lse_public_policy_group_maximizing_2011,
	title = {Maximizing the impacts of your research: a handbook for social scientists},
	url = {http://www.lse.ac.uk/government/research/resgroups/LSEPublicPolicy/Docs/LSE_Impact_Handbook_April_2011.pdf},
	author = {{LSE} Public Policy Group},
	urldate = {2015-12-01},
	date = {2011}
}

@report{meagher_research_2013,
	title = {Research Impact on Practice: Case Study Analysis},
	url = {http://www.esrc.ac.uk/files/research/evaluation-and-impact/research-impact-on-practice/},
	author = {Meagher, Laura},
	date = {2013}
}

@report{pscheida_nutzung_2014,
	title = {Nutzung von Social Media und onlinebasierten Anwendungen in der Wissenschaft - Ergebnisse des Science 2.0-Survey 2014.},
	url = {http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/16313/Science20_Datenreport_2014_PDF_A.indd.pdf},
	author = {Pscheida, Daniela and Minet, Claudia and Herbst, Sabrina and Albrecht, Steffen and Köhler, Thomas},
	urldate = {2015-11-24},
	date = {2014}
}

@report{ref_01.2014_research_2014,
	title = {Research Excellence Framework 2014: The results},
	url = {http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/pub/REF%2001%202014%20-%20full%20document.pdf},
	author = {{REF} 01.2014},
	date = {2014}
}

@online{tanner_kdcs_2012,
	title = {{KDCS} {\textgreater} Balanced Value Impact Model},
	url = {http://www.kdcs.kcl.ac.uk/innovation/impact.html},
	author = {Tanner, Simon},
	urldate = {2015-12-01},
	date = {2012}
}

@unpublished{warwick_whose_2004,
	location = {{McMaster} University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.},
	title = {Whose funeral? A case study of computational methods and reasons for their use or neglect in English literature},
	url = {http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/155094/},
	type = {{CaSTA} 2004 - The Face of Text, Computer Assisted Text Analysis in the Humanities, Canadian Symposium on Text Analysis November 19 - 21},
	howpublished = {{CaSTA} 2004 - The Face of Text, Computer Assisted Text Analysis in the Humanities, Canadian Symposium on Text Analysis November 19 - 21},
	author = {Warwick, Claire},
	urldate = {2015-11-24},
	date = {2004}
}

@report{warwick_no_2004,
	title = {No such thing as Humanities Computing? An Analytical History of Digital Resource Creation and Computing in the Humanities},
	url = {http://dro.dur.ac.uk/15197/},
	author = {Warwick, Claire},
	urldate = {2015-11-24},
	date = {2004}
}

@report{wilsdon_metric_2015,
	title = {The Metric Tide. Report of the Independent review of the Role of Metrics in research Assessment and Management.},
	url = {http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/Independentresearch/2015/The,Metric,Tide/2015_metric_tide.pdf},
	author = {Wilsdon, James and Allen, Liz and Belfiore, Eleonora and Campbell, Philip and Curry, Stephen and Hill, Steven and Jones, Richard and Kain, Roger and Kerridge, Simon and Thelwall, Mike and Tinkler, Jane and Viney, Ian and Wouters, Paul and Hill, Jude and Johnson, Ben},
	date = {2015}
}

@report{wynne_ed._longitudinal_2011,
	title = {Longitudinal Study of Impacts},
	url = {http://www-sk.let.uu.nl/u/D3C-2.1.pdf},
	author = {Wynne (Ed.), Martin},
	date = {2011}
}

@article{seglen_why_1997,
	title = {Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research},
	volume = {314},
	pages = {498--502},
	number = {7079},
	journaltitle = {{BMJ}},
	author = {Seglen, Per O},
	date = {1997}
}