Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[clusteragent/autoscaling] Pass correct value of internal spec to hash #29374

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

jennchenn
Copy link
Member

@jennchenn jennchenn commented Sep 16, 2024

What does this PR do?

Update logic to pass the correct value of the internal spec to hashing function before comparing with remote spec.

Motivation

Remote/internal spec was being reported as different even though they both matched. Fixes CASCL-65

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

  1. Deploy a cluster with autoscaling enabled
  2. Enable autoscaling via the UI
  3. Check that cluster is being autoscaled / DatadogPodAutoscaler status updates

@jennchenn jennchenn added team/containers qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Sep 16, 2024
@jennchenn jennchenn requested a review from a team as a code owner September 16, 2024 19:03
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Sep 16, 2024

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 44462305 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=44462305 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit a4a2c74

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: e50840b9-2c51-407d-95a7-66baa8fea682 Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: 7c22280
Comparison: 26ac7b1

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
basic_py_check % cpu utilization +2.11 [-0.62, +4.85] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.76 [-0.00, +1.53] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.17 [+0.06, +0.29] 1 Logs
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization +0.01 [-2.62, +2.64] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.03 [-0.10, +0.03] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.62 [-1.44, +0.20] 1 Logs
idle memory utilization -0.62 [-0.67, -0.58] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed
idle memory_usage 9/10

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@jennchenn
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Sep 16, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 23m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@jennchenn jennchenn added the backport/7.58.x Automatically create a backport PR to 7.58.x label Sep 16, 2024
@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Sep 16, 2024

MergeQueue: This merge request is not mergeable, blocked by github

PR can't be merged according to github policy

If you need support, contact us on Slack #devflow with those details!

@jennchenn
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Sep 16, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Sep 16, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 23m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 6853e7e into main Sep 16, 2024
206 of 216 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the jenn/cascl-fix-hash-diff-remote branch September 16, 2024 22:53
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.59.0 milestone Sep 16, 2024
agent-platform-auto-pr bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/7.58.x Automatically create a backport PR to 7.58.x changelog/no-changelog component/autoscaling qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/containers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants