Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CWS] Add is_public field to IP addresses #30767

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

YoannGh
Copy link
Contributor

@YoannGh YoannGh commented Nov 5, 2024

What does this PR do?

This PR allows evaluating whether an IP address is public using a list of pre-defined private IP ranges.

Motivation

Describe how to test/QA your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@YoannGh YoannGh added this to the 7.61.0 milestone Nov 5, 2024
@YoannGh YoannGh requested review from a team as code owners November 5, 2024 13:18
@github-actions github-actions bot added component/system-probe long review PR is complex, plan time to review it labels Nov 5, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=48376441 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit de7b169

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: ac427697-9dee-4763-94ad-41abe1a3f918

Baseline: 8de1e6b
Comparison: de7b169
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +2.05 [+1.90, +2.19] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.29 [+0.23, +0.36] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.20 [-0.15, +0.54] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.14, +0.22] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.21, +0.23] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.10, +0.10] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.08 [-0.33, +0.17] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.18 [-0.90, +0.54] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.30 [-0.78, +0.18] 1 Logs
idle memory utilization -1.23 [-1.29, -1.16] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -1.46 [-1.52, -1.40] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_tree memory utilization -1.57 [-1.72, -1.41] 1 Logs
basic_py_check % cpu utilization -1.95 [-5.85, +1.95] 1 Logs
idle_all_features memory utilization -2.05 [-2.18, -1.92] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization -2.67 [-6.07, +0.74] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
idle memory_usage 7/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 9/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 9/10 bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

"169.254.0.0/16",
"192.0.0.0/24",
"192.0.2.0/24",
"192.88.99.0/24",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This block is not private:

In contrast with previously described blocks, packets destined to addresses from this block do appear in the public Internet.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed it, thanks!

Copy link
Member

@brycekahle brycekahle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One minor comment

@YoannGh YoannGh force-pushed the yoanngh/private-ip-secl-field branch from 8a24d7c to de7b169 Compare November 6, 2024 17:55
@YoannGh
Copy link
Contributor Author

YoannGh commented Nov 7, 2024

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2024-11-07 10:35:11 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 23m.

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 4b74848 into main Nov 7, 2024
223 of 224 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the yoanngh/private-ip-secl-field branch November 7, 2024 11:09
@YoannGh YoannGh added the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog component/system-probe long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants