Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[backport] [NPM] Fix prebuilt conntracker warning #30779

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

hmahmood
Copy link
Contributor

@hmahmood hmahmood commented Nov 5, 2024

What does this PR do?

Fix a warning log for when we load the deprecated prebuilt conntracker. This log was getting emitted in cases where we would not load the prebuilt version of the conntracker.

Motivation

Describe how to test/QA your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@hmahmood hmahmood added changelog/no-changelog component/system-probe qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Nov 5, 2024
@hmahmood hmahmood added this to the 7.60.0 milestone Nov 5, 2024
@hmahmood hmahmood requested a review from a team as a code owner November 5, 2024 17:33
@hmahmood hmahmood requested review from AyyLam and removed request for a team November 5, 2024 17:33
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Nov 5, 2024
@hmahmood hmahmood changed the title [NPM] Fix prebuilt conntracker warning [backport] [NPM] Fix prebuilt conntracker warning Nov 5, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=48280681 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit be4c8ee

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 520ea963-c401-44d1-a6e7-c068b9969ceb

Baseline: bebb00d
Comparison: be4c8ee
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
basic_py_check % cpu utilization +3.63 [-0.24, +7.49] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.99 [+0.87, +1.10] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
idle_all_features memory utilization +0.21 [+0.11, +0.31] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.12 [+0.07, +0.17] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.11 [-0.07, +0.28] 1 Logs
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization +0.10 [-3.43, +3.63] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.08 [+0.03, +0.13] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.44, +0.53] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.00 [-0.33, +0.33] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.00 [-0.25, +0.25] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.00 [-0.23, +0.22] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.11, +0.10] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.33 [-0.45, -0.20] 1 Logs
idle memory utilization -0.37 [-0.42, -0.32] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.89 [-1.70, -0.09] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.94 [-1.66, -0.22] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@hmahmood
Copy link
Contributor Author

hmahmood commented Nov 5, 2024

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Nov 5, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in 7.60.x is 21m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 07e7e44 into 7.60.x Nov 5, 2024
320 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the hasan.mahmood/backport-fix-warning branch November 5, 2024 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog component/system-probe qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants