Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Idea - Summary #57

Open
0ssigeno opened this issue Sep 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Idea - Summary #57

0ssigeno opened this issue Sep 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@0ssigeno
Copy link

Hi, I have inserted XlmMacroDeobfuscator inside IntelOwl (intelowlproject/IntelOwl#196) to have a better understanding of the malware campaigns that are running these days in Italy.
To have a report, i'm abusing the json format, but the the entire json is quite big and hard to read if you don't know what you are looking for.
Would be a good idea to have a summary of what have been found? My personal use case would be find urls, allowing to easily find the document requests and the next payload to analyse. Don't get me wrong, is easy to make a regex to find the urls inside the report myself, but inside IntelOwl we decided to touch the tool result the least possible.

@DissectMalware
Copy link
Owner

Good idea.

Did you used --output-level switch?

image

Currently, it is only suppress uninteresting XLM macros

However, I can extend this to also remove uninteresting defined names ...

@DissectMalware DissectMalware self-assigned this Sep 24, 2020
@DissectMalware DissectMalware added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 24, 2020
@0ssigeno
Copy link
Author

I have to be honest, I did not test the --output-level, and it kinda does what I was looking for. I'm sorry to have bothered without having tested each switch.

@DissectMalware
Copy link
Owner

DissectMalware commented Sep 26, 2020

No worries. But still I think there is a room to better control the output. Currently, only macros can be filtered using this switch. May it is also a good idea to filter defined name, memory and file dumps. So, I will leave this issue open for improving this part of the project. Feel free to share your ideas on how we can improve this part.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants