Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the WideResNet and DeeplabV3+ baseline accuracy #119

Open
Autochthonal opened this issue Oct 31, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

About the WideResNet and DeeplabV3+ baseline accuracy #119

Autochthonal opened this issue Oct 31, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Autochthonal
Copy link

Hi there!

When I tried to use the WideResNet Baseline for the CIFAR dataset classification, there occurs a significant accuracy gap between the model output and the ideal level provided here.

And this problem also exists when I used the DeeplabV3+ baseline for Camvid dataset. I notice you have kindly provided your solution here, unfortunately, after I checked the source code of Camvid datasetmodule, I am not sure about whether the basic_augmentparameter can help model reach the 65% mIoU.

So if you can provide demos on WideResNet and DeeplabV3+ baseline that can reach better accuracy, it will help me alot.

Thanks * 3!

@o-laurent o-laurent added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 5, 2024
@o-laurent
Copy link
Contributor

o-laurent commented Nov 5, 2024

Hello @Autochthonal!

Sorry for not getting back to you sooner; I've been thinking about your questions.

Concerning WideResNet on CIFAR, which dataset are you talking about, CIFAR-10 or CIFAR-100? In my experiments, WideResNet has been overfitting a lot on CIFAR-100 and needs data augmentations to work properly. We already have some of them implemented in the library, although not enough, and not the ones that, according to your website (thanks for the link), have the best performance.

Concerning CamVid, did you run the experiment? It is probably also a matter of data augmentation and pre-training, as you said in #113 if I remember correctly. basic_augment helped a bit. @giannifranchi might add soon SuperPixelMix, which could be helpful in your case. Still, pre-training will likely be the game-changer here, given the very small size of the dataset. I can look at these issues, but I don't have much time in the following weeks, unfortunately.

Thank you, and have a great day.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants