We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Specification 1.0 for SchnorrProof (p 10, p 27) has the challenge as
c i,j = H(Q, K i,j , h i,j )
But implementation make_schnorr_proof in schnorr.py. line 89 has
c = hash_elems(k, h)
This was discussed in
Election-Tech-Initiative/electionguard-python#278
and it was decided to leave out the Q.
The specification should be amended after reviewing the decision to leave out the Q.
No response
- OS:
The 2.0 document being circulated "Proofs in ElectionGuard– changes for version 2.0" section 2 should also be amended.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
CC @benaloh
Sorry, something went wrong.
benaloh
No branches or pull requests
Is there an existing issue for this?
Current Behavior
Specification 1.0 for SchnorrProof (p 10, p 27) has the challenge as
c i,j = H(Q, K i,j , h i,j )
But implementation make_schnorr_proof in schnorr.py. line 89 has
c = hash_elems(k, h)
This was discussed in
Election-Tech-Initiative/electionguard-python#278
and it was decided to leave out the Q.
Expected Behavior
The specification should be amended after reviewing the decision to leave out the Q.
Steps To Reproduce
No response
Environment
- OS:
Anything else?
The 2.0 document being circulated "Proofs in ElectionGuard– changes for version 2.0" section 2 should also be amended.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: