Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve the definition of the cfClassScheme entity #2

Open
jdvorak001 opened this issue Oct 6, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Improve the definition of the cfClassScheme entity #2

jdvorak001 opened this issue Oct 6, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@jdvorak001
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@jdvorak001
Copy link
Member Author

We start from:

Classification scheme: an arrangement of Classifications to reflect a certain aspect of objects. In CERIF, the concept of Classification Scheme is physically (cfClassScheme) and logically (cfClassificationScheme) defined as an entity in an ERM, represented by attributes and through maintaining relationships with other entities: classes, classification schemes, multilingual classification scheme names, multilingual classification scheme descriptions.

@jdvorak001
Copy link
Member Author

A first approximation:

Classification Scheme: a structured collection of Classifications to describe a certain aspect of objects or their relationships.

CERIF Classification Schemes can represent flat or hierarchical lists, taxonomies, thesauri, ontologies or any general arrangement of concepts (Classifications).

jdvorak001 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2017
@jdvorak001
updated the definitions of eight most basic entities
ab8fd53 
- Project (closes #3),
- Person (closes #4), 
- OrgUnit (closes #5), 
- Publication (closes #7), 
- Patent, 
- Product (closes #8), 
- Classification (closes #1),
- Classification Scheme (closes #2)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jdvorak001