Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add stable channel for the f5-bigip-ctlr-operator in **Redhat Openshift Catalog** #3495

Open
rgfarid opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@rgfarid
Copy link

rgfarid commented Jul 23, 2024

Title

Add stable channel for the f5-bigip-ctlr-operator in Redhat Openshift Catalog

Description

When we list the Redhat Openshift catalog, under certified-operator-index, we get this output:

NAME DISPLAY NAME DEFAULT CHANNEL

f5-bigip-ctlr-operator F5 Container Ingress Services beta

We have a requirement for our production environment, the operator must be in stable channel.

We have check with redhat and they have reply to check with the ISV, that is to say F5 support.

Actual Problem

The f5-bigip-ctlr-operator is only available in beta channel.

To check the default operator channel you can execute this command on an openshift cluster

$ oc get subs -n <operator_namespace>

output:

NAME               PACKAGE            SOURCE                  CHANNEL

xxx                    xxxxxxxxx            xxxxxxx                    operator_default_channel

Bellow the link to the discussion in F5 Devcentral:

https://community.f5.com/kb/TechnicalArticles/f5-big-ip-deployment-with-openshift---platform-and-networking-options/318249/comments/331905?emcs_t=S2h8ZW1haWx8bWVudGlvbl9zdWJzY3JpcHRpb258TFlYUUE5T1lZSU5PTFh8LTF8QVRfTUVOVElPTlN8aEs

Solution Proposed

Deliver the operator in stable channel in the redhat catalogue, check with redhat if needed.

@trinaths
Copy link
Contributor

Created [CONTCNTR-4808] for internal tracking.

@trinaths trinaths added JIRA and removed untriaged no JIRA created labels Jul 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants