Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add advanced rbacdefinition validation #103

Open
3 tasks
sudermanjr opened this issue Nov 12, 2019 · 1 comment
Open
3 tasks

Add advanced rbacdefinition validation #103

sudermanjr opened this issue Nov 12, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement Adding additional functionality or improvements help wanted Extra attention is needed pinned Prevents stalebot from removing priority: could Future work depending on bandwidth and availability

Comments

@sudermanjr
Copy link
Member

Combining the requests of both #99 and #101, it would be very beneficial to end users to have some extended validation of the rbacdefintion. This issue will serve as a proposal and tracking issue for that request.

Things to be validated:

  • Namespaces referenced by rbacdefinition currently exist
  • Roles/ClusterRoles that are referenced in rbacdefinition currently exist
  • ServiceAccounts referenced by rbacdefition do not exists, or if they do, let the user know? Defined by results of Verify behavior around pre-existing service accounts #84
@sudermanjr sudermanjr added enhancement Adding additional functionality or improvements help wanted Extra attention is needed stretch This is a stretch goal for a particular milestone labels Nov 12, 2019
This was referenced Nov 12, 2019
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 11, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale Marked as stale by stalebot label Jan 11, 2020
@lucasreed lucasreed added the pinned Prevents stalebot from removing label Jan 13, 2020
@stale stale bot removed the stale Marked as stale by stalebot label Jan 13, 2020
@sudermanjr sudermanjr removed the stretch This is a stretch goal for a particular milestone label Oct 12, 2020
@sudermanjr sudermanjr added the priority: could Future work depending on bandwidth and availability label Oct 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement Adding additional functionality or improvements help wanted Extra attention is needed pinned Prevents stalebot from removing priority: could Future work depending on bandwidth and availability
Projects
Fairwinds Open Source
Status: No status
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lucasreed @sudermanjr