-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
user losing access to abstract after adding another owner #430
Comments
This might be related to issue #86. |
If someone is removed as owner, the abstract might still be listed to her/him in "my abstracts", but access is denied. Conference owners might also be able to edit abstracts, if they were abstract owners before. |
mpsonntag
added a commit
to mpsonntag/GCA-Web
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2019
Using the 'isOwner' instead of 'contains' method in the abstract 'update' method. It is suspected that the 'contains' method does not work as expected. See issue G-Node#430 for details.
mpsonntag
added a commit
to mpsonntag/GCA-Web
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2019
Using the 'isOwner' instead of 'contains' method in the abstract 'update' method. It is suspected that the 'contains' method does not work as expected. See issue G-Node#430 for details.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There were two or three cases where a user added another user as owner to an abstract and then could not access the abstract any more (500 internal server error), although the database still had the user as owner. A restart of GCA was necessary to restore order. There were other cases where adding another owner did not cause any problems, so this may be hard to figure out, but it is a serious issue and should be fixed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: