Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Display CO2 savings for walking and cycling routes in detail view #5199

Open
stadtnavimanager opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@stadtnavimanager
Copy link

Description:

For Public Transport and Intermodal Routes, the overview displays the CO2 emissions, and the detail view additionally shows how much CO2 is saved compared to a car trip. However, for walking and cycling routes, this information is missing in the detail view.

It would be great to also show the CO2 savings compared to a car trip in the detail view for walking and cycling routes. (See attached screenshots for reference.)


Steps to reproduce:

  1. Perform a route search, e.g. https://opas.matka.fi/reitti/Piitie%201%2C%20Vantaa%3A%3A60.291831728250386%2C24.987936615943912/Kaunokkitie%209%2C%20Vantaa%3A%3A60.29857301873039%2C25.002350807189945?locale=en&time=1733997446
  2. Compare the information displayed in the detail view for:
    • Public transport or intermodal routes (CO2 emissions and savings shown).
    • Walking or cycling routes (no CO2 savings displayed).

Observed behavior:

CO2 savings compared to a car trip are not displayed in the detail view for walking and cycling routes.

Expected behavior:

The detail view for walking and cycling routes should include CO2 savings information, similar to other route types.


Screenshots:

image
image
image


Environment:

  • Browser: Edge

Additional information:

Adding CO2 savings information for walking and cycling routes would highlight their environmental benefits and encourage users to choose sustainable travel modes.

@vesameskanen
Copy link
Member

I guess walking/cycling emissions are known to be zero. However, savings information is relevant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants