Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extract ACNP and DC flows for PEVF schedule #12

Open
Haigutus opened this issue Mar 30, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Extract ACNP and DC flows for PEVF schedule #12

Haigutus opened this issue Mar 30, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@Haigutus
Copy link
Owner

ControlArea.netInterchange attributes: AC NP from PEVF + DC NP deduced from the EquivalentInjection linked to Xnodes having the IdentifiedObject.description = ‘HVDC’

@Haigutus
Copy link
Owner Author

Haigutus commented Mar 30, 2021

Planned approach:

  1. Find Control Area of type Interexchange
  2. Find All TieFlows, EIC and NP related to that ControlArea
  3. Sum All flows on TieFLows
  4. Extract All Tieflows related to boundary with HVDC in description (HVDC flows)
  5. Extract form point 3. sum of HVDC flows (ACNP)

Open questions:

  1. What to do if there are no TieFlows? Use Equivalent Injections?
  2. What to do if there are no Tieflows associated to the Interexcahnge Control Area? Use all defined Tieflows?
  3. What if HVCD does not have TieFlow marked? TieFlow should be added and taken into account for HVDC flows and ACNP?

@Haigutus
Copy link
Owner Author

Haigutus commented Mar 30, 2021

Needed Relations:

ControlArea -> TieFlow -> Terminal
image

SvPowerflow -> Terminal
image

EquivalentInjection -> Terminal
image

@Alberto-Bonelli
Copy link

Hello Kristjan,

Assuming that the TieFlows definition based on a provided list and the link between these TieFlows and their respective ControlAreas were already corrected (using the already existing script):

  1. If a TieFlow is missing at a specific Xnode then AC or DC NP should not be assessed. EquivalentInjection.p values can be used for the assessment of the AC/DC NP where TieFlows are defined.
  2. This should be fixed by the already implemented corrections. All TieFlows in IGM should be associated to a ControlArea in the IGM
  3. If a TieFlow is missing then power flows on that specific tie-line should not be considered in the DC NP assessment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants