You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the original paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.01690), the authors mention that they used 100 iterations for each run of the white-box attacks. However, in the current implementation, it appears that the attacks are only run for 10 iterations. Can anyone explain why this change was made? Is there a trade-off between accuracy and efficiency?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
❔ Any questions
In the original paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.01690), the authors mention that they used 100 iterations for each run of the white-box attacks. However, in the current implementation, it appears that the attacks are only run for 10 iterations. Can anyone explain why this change was made? Is there a trade-off between accuracy and efficiency?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: