IPKISS Compatibility

[zeyueN]

Hi! Very excited to see this work. Our team is currently using IPKISS for layout related stuffs and has a code base already building around IPKISS. I'm wondering, if we were to migrate things over to this tool you are building, how easy do you think the process would be?

[HelgeGehring]

Hey zeyuen, nice to hear that you like gdshelpers!
I never used ipkiss, but I just asked someone from our group who switched from ipkiss to gdshelpers as he joined our group. He told me switching was quite easy for him :)

[zeyueN]

Thanks for the response, that's great to hear Helge. I'm just wondering what the future plan/roadmap is for the project, and if you guys are open to feature requests?

…

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 8:55 AM Helge Gehring ***@***.***> wrote: Hey zeyuen, nice to hear that you like gdshelpers! I never used ipkiss, but I just asked someone from our group who switched from ipkiss to gdshelpers as he joined our group. He told me switching was quite easy for him :) — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#22 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALP52MH46C5DJSS3AC6NYZTSCUA35ANCNFSM4QLCCPMA> .

-- xanadu.ai <http://xanadu.ai> "To build quantum computers that are useful and available to people everywhere" This e-mail message is privileged, confidential and subject to copyright. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. Le contenu du présent courriel est privilégié, confidentiel et soumis à des droits d'auteur. Il est interdit de l'utiliser ou de le divulguer sans autorisation.

[HelgeGehring]

At the moment, most updates come from problems we have while designing layouts. Besides that, I'm planning to add an integration of Meep for directly simulating designed parts (see #9 ).
We're very open to feature requests, bug reports and pull requests :)
What features would you need?