Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I've though about this, but never really figured out a good way to implement it. This sounds lika a great way though. Are you interested in implementing a feature like this? Note that pup supports similar shell operators as deno task shell, so some dependency logic could be carried out simply using &&, || and so on. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey! I'm considering using pup for a rather large project (~ 20 services), but a few features are currently lacking. One of the most important addition to pup before making the switch is the possibility to declare dependencies:
With this config file, running
pup start frontend
would runapi
first.Later on, if Pup features a healthcheck, the
dependsOn
field could be extended with features similar to docker compose #depends_on:Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions