You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Related to #28 - we are adding more disease terms, and probably will continue to do so. Currently, all terms end up directly under "diseases" in the IHCC view. This is starting to look a bit messy, as some are diseases of anatomical system and could be categorized as such (maybe "disease of anatomy" and "other diseases" for now... I'm not sure)
I'm not sure how this would work for the browser, as all other categories are just flat lists. But I worry that the list for diseases will get too long and be hard to navigate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@beckyjackson UI updates as you have suggested are possible, but need to be prioritized with other feature development based on the next design/development cycle; ill note this and connect with Christina and Melanie on that.
Thanks @rosibaj - the changes we are making to the GECKO file now will not impact the JSON until we make changes to the IHCC view & the code to generate the JSON.
Related to #28 - we are adding more disease terms, and probably will continue to do so. Currently, all terms end up directly under "diseases" in the IHCC view. This is starting to look a bit messy, as some are diseases of anatomical system and could be categorized as such (maybe "disease of anatomy" and "other diseases" for now... I'm not sure)
I'm not sure how this would work for the browser, as all other categories are just flat lists. But I worry that the list for diseases will get too long and be hard to navigate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: