Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cvn module report from evaluation #179

Open
17 of 18 tasks
keski opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #196
Open
17 of 18 tasks

cvn module report from evaluation #179

keski opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #196

Comments

@keski
Copy link
Collaborator

keski commented Feb 7, 2024

Report from FOOPS!

  • Inconsistent ontology IDs (error due to versioned ontology URI, ignore this)
  • Minimum metadata missing (license)
  • Prefix not found in prefix.cc nor LOV registries (ontology not yet released, ignore this)
  • Ontology not found in LOV registries (ontology not yet released, ignore this)
  • Metadata not accessible in LOV registries (ontology not yet released, ignore this)
  • OM2: Missing parts of recommended metadata (creation date, citation (?))
  • OM3: Missing detailed metadata (doi, publisher, logo, status, source, issued date) (not all are applicable)
  • Documentation label missing for 3 terms
  • Documentation definitions (rdfs:comment or skos:definition) missing for 2 terms
  • License is not resolvable
  • Basic provenance metadata missing (creation date)
  • Detailed provenance metadata missing (issued, publisher) (ontology not yet released, ignore this)

Report from OOPS!

  • Unconnected ontology elements (Process)
  • Missing annotations (see above)
  • Missing disjointness (ignore this)
  • Missing domain and range for properties (fix where applicable)
  • Inverse relationships not explicitly declared (ignore this)
  • Ambiguous namespace (verify that ontology namespace is defined)

SPARQL support for CQs

  • CVN-1: Supported
  • CVN-6: Partial support
  • CVN-Process-1: Supported
  • CVN-Process-6: Supported
  • CVN-VP-1: Supported
  • CVN-VP-3: Not covered
  • CVN-Type-3: Partial support
  • C0-1: Supported
@keski
Copy link
Collaborator Author

keski commented Mar 13, 2024

Could relatedStrategy have CVN or CVNBluePrint as domain? @evabl444 @huanyu-li

@keski keski linked a pull request Mar 13, 2024 that will close this issue
@keski keski reopened this Mar 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant