Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test JSON Schema validation; SI base units; cleanup #6

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

uellue
Copy link
Member

@uellue uellue commented Sep 3, 2024

  • Make sure that the JSON representation and JSON Schema work with a 3rd party validator jsonschema
  • Remove unused code -- apparently WrapValidator is doing most of the job
  • Convert to SI base units for JSON representation -- reduce variability of output

* Make sure that the JSON representation and JSON Schema work with a 3rd party validator `jsonschema`
* Remove unused code -- apparently WrapValidator is doing most of the job
* Convert to SI base units for JSON representation -- reduce variability of output
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (3ed0db5) to head (fe56571).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main        #6      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   94.11%   100.00%   +5.88%     
===========================================
  Files           1         1              
  Lines          51        45       -6     
  Branches        6         4       -2     
===========================================
- Hits           48        45       -3     
+ Misses          3         0       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@uellue uellue merged commit c096d53 into LiberTEM:main Sep 3, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants