You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After upgrading to v1.4, I am trying to rethink "how does it works" in our network...
Mainly I would like to have If You would like to have real high-avability instead of fault-tolerant only, there is a need to do NAT on LibreQoS or on some other VM before LibreQoS.
So now to do this You need minimum 2 baremetal servers with VM's:
2x BGP,
2x VM-NAT,
2x LibreQoS,
Implementing NAT in LibreQoS is good idea because:
doing NAT is not so CPU consuming,
4x VM's is better than 6, less phisical network interfaces required,
less vm's, less network interfaces = less work to do/less power consumption/less servers required in total,
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
After upgrading to v1.4, I am trying to rethink "how does it works" in our network...
Mainly I would like to have If You would like to have real high-avability instead of fault-tolerant only, there is a need to do NAT on LibreQoS or on some other VM before LibreQoS.
So now to do this You need minimum 2 baremetal servers with VM's:
2x BGP,
2x VM-NAT,
2x LibreQoS,
Implementing NAT in LibreQoS is good idea because:
Can XDP do NAT?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions