Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

getParamState #3

Open
fabien-vinckier opened this issue Oct 3, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

getParamState #3

fabien-vinckier opened this issue Oct 3, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@fabien-vinckier
Copy link
Contributor

It seems to me than there is an issue with the getParamState function and/or with the wiki explaining it:

  • In the wiki, the example says to put something like
    [~,phi] = getStateParamInput(x_t,P_t,in, 'observation');
    in the observation function...
    --> Usually, at this level the "in" argument is already defined as an inG (i.e. options.inG) or as a inF (i.e. options.inF)
  • But in the function, the first lines are a switch that select options.inG or options.inF according to the value of "functionType"...

I guess the "wiki" solution is the good one to avoid something like options.inG.inG but maybe I missed a point in the way you wanted to use the function?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant