You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The aligner bwa mem provides the XA tag for supplemental alignments.
They are present even after using an MQ30 filter, i.e. MQ is generally 30-40 (surprising!).
We could trial removing reads/alignments with these and test results. Generally, other species from the same genera are picked up (Veillonella parvula -> V. dispar, etc), but Schaalia o. to Actinomyces sp are also present.
The aligner bwa mem provides the XA tag for supplemental alignments.
They are present even after using an MQ30 filter, i.e. MQ is generally 30-40 (surprising!).
We could trial removing reads/alignments with these and test results. Generally, other species from the same genera are picked up (Veillonella parvula -> V. dispar, etc), but Schaalia o. to Actinomyces sp are also present.
Streptococcus is, as ever, problematic.
XA:Z:NZ_LR134375.1_Veillonella_dispar_strain_NCTC11831_chromosome_1,-2088145,9S67M,7;
/ngsssd1/rcug/wochenende_test/XA_tags
Edit, will likely have a small effect (2-3 %?) based on one example only.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: