You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Idea:
What if you could set any 2 of the 3 inputs as outputs? The default output should remain output-only.
When you make one input into an output, it would grey out the bottom 5 columns since now there are only 4 ways you can receive inputs (0,0, 1,0, 0,1, and 1,1 between the last two inputs), and the now outputted row would have the same options as the default Output.
When you make two inputs into an output, you would only have two columns for on and off, and everything else would be the options of the 3 total outputs.
This will allow for you to set up even more intricate circuits, allowing one input to activate more than one output, and any combination in-between.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Idea:
What if you could set any 2 of the 3 inputs as outputs? The default output should remain output-only.
When you make one input into an output, it would grey out the bottom 5 columns since now there are only 4 ways you can receive inputs (0,0, 1,0, 0,1, and 1,1 between the last two inputs), and the now outputted row would have the same options as the default Output.
When you make two inputs into an output, you would only have two columns for on and off, and everything else would be the options of the 3 total outputs.
This will allow for you to set up even more intricate circuits, allowing one input to activate more than one output, and any combination in-between.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: