You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our company would like to try this library. But compared to installing from Github, we would rather prefer installing from CPAN. Libraries from CPAN are better known by the Perl world, thus could have less chance to get namespace changing or collision with other libraries in future.
Besides, I see you are having "Swagger" at the top level namespace. I wonder if it could be better to move it into some namespace like Catalyst::Controller::Swagger::Spec?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
btw, I just see that Swagger has renamed to OpenAPI. Mojolicious and Dancer support can be done via https://metacpan.org/release/JSON-Validator I am new to Swagger/OpenAPI but I wonder if that one can be utilized or not.
I ended up using Mojolicious::Lite + Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI for my new rest API. I feel Mojolicious::Lite easier than Catalyst::Controller::REST in creating REST api. And with Plack it's possible to integrate into a Catalyst part and a Mojo part into one web application.
Hi,
Our company would like to try this library. But compared to installing from Github, we would rather prefer installing from CPAN. Libraries from CPAN are better known by the Perl world, thus could have less chance to get namespace changing or collision with other libraries in future.
Besides, I see you are having "Swagger" at the top level namespace. I wonder if it could be better to move it into some namespace like Catalyst::Controller::Swagger::Spec?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: