Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Iterable[(String, String)] in ? operator #79

Open
acjay opened this issue Jan 27, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Support Iterable[(String, String)] in ? operator #79

acjay opened this issue Jan 27, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@acjay
Copy link

acjay commented Jan 27, 2015

Why not also allow ? and & accept an Iterable of pairs? That would be more in fitting with the dsl than addParams.

@theon
Copy link
Contributor

theon commented May 23, 2015

Makes sense. I can add a overloaded version of ? and &.

@theon
Copy link
Contributor

theon commented Jan 20, 2016

I need to revisit this. I think I need to audit all the parameter and return types and make sure they are sensible.

There was a recent twitter conversation about this where the consensus for return types was that they should be as specific as possible. There were mixed views on parameters types.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants