Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Effective exponents in reports are plotted always at 1.65 GeV #2030

Open
niclaurenti opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Effective exponents in reports are plotted always at 1.65 GeV #2030

niclaurenti opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@niclaurenti
Copy link
Contributor

In the effective exponents part of the reports the plots are done taking the value at 1.65 GeV instead of Q0.
This is relevant if someone wants to do a fit with Q0 different from 1.65.

For example in the plot in

https://vp.nnpdf.science/QgE-00fgTe2cnIK-3Pwo4g==/figures/exponents_report_current_basisfromfit_plot_alpha_eff_Sigma.pdf

the horizontal lines are plotted for Q=Q0 (i.e. 1.65 for the orange and 1.50 for the green lines), while the bands are plotted at Q=1.65 both for the green and orange one.

@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member

scarlehoff commented Mar 28, 2024

The report has a fixed Q all across for plotting (1.65 GeV, which is generally what we use) while the next-iteration-values (vp-nextfitruncard) are taken (correctly now xd) at Q0.

Now... when you do this plot where both the values are relevant I'm not sure what the correct solution would be... Maybe we should just drop this plot when Q =/= Q0 since it would be inconsistent?

(you can always create the plot manually by doing a report where you have two namespaces, one with Q = 1.5 GeV and another with Q = 1.65 GeV)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants