You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the effective exponents part of the reports the plots are done taking the value at 1.65 GeV instead of Q0.
This is relevant if someone wants to do a fit with Q0 different from 1.65.
the horizontal lines are plotted for Q=Q0 (i.e. 1.65 for the orange and 1.50 for the green lines), while the bands are plotted at Q=1.65 both for the green and orange one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The report has a fixed Q all across for plotting (1.65 GeV, which is generally what we use) while the next-iteration-values (vp-nextfitruncard) are taken (correctly now xd) at Q0.
Now... when you do this plot where both the values are relevant I'm not sure what the correct solution would be... Maybe we should just drop this plot when Q =/= Q0 since it would be inconsistent?
(you can always create the plot manually by doing a report where you have two namespaces, one with Q = 1.5 GeV and another with Q = 1.65 GeV)
In the effective exponents part of the reports the plots are done taking the value at 1.65 GeV instead of Q0.
This is relevant if someone wants to do a fit with Q0 different from 1.65.
For example in the plot in
https://vp.nnpdf.science/QgE-00fgTe2cnIK-3Pwo4g==/figures/exponents_report_current_basisfromfit_plot_alpha_eff_Sigma.pdf
the horizontal lines are plotted for Q=Q0 (i.e. 1.65 for the orange and 1.50 for the green lines), while the bands are plotted at Q=1.65 both for the green and orange one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: