POD discussion: Wheeler-Kiladis spectra #123
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
Description of pull request #45 / #46 from @bitterbark : The Wheeler-Kiladis code now can reproduce the obs_data'figures with provided NCEP reanalysis data. It can also better handle different observations with more flexibility in time variable/calendar descriptions, and by crudely handling missing values. Note that the latter does not produce great results. This commit is accompanied by an updated obs_data.tar with the new obs figures that show the same data as before but are formatted exactly like the model figures. See figures ) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The branch containing existing development work on this POD has been renamed from pod/Wheeler_Kiladis to feature/update_Wheeler_Kiladis, as part of the reorganization proposed in issue #106. Note that this branch contains changes from PR #46 but not those from PR #69, and will be deleted when the latter PR is closed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@bitterbark @tsjackson-noaa |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Noted, thanks!
…On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 4:23 PM Fiaz Ahmed ***@***.***> wrote:
@bitterbark <https://github.com/bitterbark> @tsjackson-noaa
<https://github.com/tsjackson-noaa>
I'm testing this POD on CMIP6 data. This POD requires ua200 as required
input whereas most models with daily CMIP6 output only have ua250
available. I suggest including ua250 as an alternate.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#123 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHLJVQE6AOZKK3PLLDUHFRLTA3LVRANCNFSM4YHNA3UQ>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thread for maintenance and updates to the Wheeler-Kiladis POD.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions