Add resilience arguments to yml files

[joseph-robertson]

Pull Request Description

Include the new include_timeseries_resilience argument in example yml files.

Checklist

Not all may apply:

• Tests (and test files) have been updated
• Documentation has been updated
  • If related to resstock-estimation, checklist includes data dictionary, source report, options_lookup
• Changelog has been updated
• openstudio tasks.rb update_measures has been run
• No unexpected regression test changes on CI (checked comparison artifacts)

[jmaguire1]

One thought/suggestion for resilience: there's a pretty non obvious thing you should change when looking at resiliency. There's a "temperature capacitance multiplier" (TCM) input in E+ that increases the thermal mass of the air node. If you just stick with the default we have right now (1.0), you'll see the building temperature increase/decrease faster than appears realistic. Looking at the literature, when people are calibrating models there isn't much consensus on what value should be used, there's a range between 3-15 depending on the building. I've been using a value of 7.0, based on what's worked well in the projects we've run, where we ran HIL experiments in SPL and tried to calibrate to a real building by changing the TCM.

[shorowit]

@jmaguire1 Why would the battery resilience metric be significantly affected by the temperature capacitance multiplier? We're not modeling power outages to calculate it, we're just seeing how long the battery would last under normal electricity usage conditions.

[jmaguire1]

@shorowit: Oops, I misunderstood what this PR was doing. I was thinking this had to do with outages, not just adding the battery resilience metric. I am curious about TCM with outages in ResStock, but that really should be a separate discussion from this PR.