You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that in the NeMo GPT repository, the zero/few shot multiple-choice task evaluation scripts for RACE are evaluated using both "context + {choice candidate}" likelihood and "answer: {choice candidate}", as described in the GPT-3 paper. However, other similar tasks such as PiQA, BoolQ, and HellaSwag are only evaluated using "context + {choice candidate}".
I'm curious if there is a specific reason for this difference in evaluation method.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello,
I noticed that in the NeMo GPT repository, the zero/few shot multiple-choice task evaluation scripts for RACE are evaluated using both "context + {choice candidate}" likelihood and "answer: {choice candidate}", as described in the GPT-3 paper. However, other similar tasks such as PiQA, BoolQ, and HellaSwag are only evaluated using "context + {choice candidate}".
I'm curious if there is a specific reason for this difference in evaluation method.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions