You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During our big renaming sessions, we agreed that "dense" would not be specified (at least in types), but sparse would be. Also there is univariate versus multivariate... So we might want to rename these types to be more consistent. Here are some suggestions:
dense_poly_type and mpoly_type (leave it as it is)
poly_type and mpoly_type (drop the dense)
poly_type and sparse_poly_type (drop dense, add sparse)
upoly_type and mpoly_type (emphasis univariate vs. multivariate)
Right now we have
dense_poly_type
andmpoly_type
During our big renaming sessions, we agreed that "dense" would not be specified (at least in types), but sparse would be. Also there is univariate versus multivariate... So we might want to rename these types to be more consistent. Here are some suggestions:
dense_poly_type
andmpoly_type
(leave it as it is)poly_type
andmpoly_type
(drop thedense
)poly_type
andsparse_poly_type
(dropdense
, addsparse
)upoly_type
andmpoly_type
(emphasis univariate vs. multivariate)univariate_poly_type
andmultivariate_poly_type
Personally I favor option 2.
CC @thofma @fieker @mgkurtz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: